1
0
mirror of https://github.com/trezor/trezor-firmware.git synced 2024-11-18 21:48:13 +00:00
trezor-firmware/trezorlib/transport/__init__.py

155 lines
4.9 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# This file is part of the Trezor project.
2016-11-25 21:53:55 +00:00
#
# Copyright (C) 2012-2018 SatoshiLabs and contributors
2016-11-25 21:53:55 +00:00
#
# This library is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3
# as published by the Free Software Foundation.
2016-11-25 21:53:55 +00:00
#
# This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the License along with this library.
# If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.html>.
2016-11-25 21:53:55 +00:00
import logging
from typing import Iterable, List, Set, Type
from ..exceptions import TrezorException
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
from ..protobuf import MessageType
if False:
# mark Set and List as used, otherwise they only exist in comments
List, Set
LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# USB vendor/product IDs for Trezors
DEV_TREZOR1 = (0x534C, 0x0001)
DEV_TREZOR2 = (0x1209, 0x53C1)
DEV_TREZOR2_BL = (0x1209, 0x53C0)
TREZORS = {DEV_TREZOR1, DEV_TREZOR2, DEV_TREZOR2_BL}
UDEV_RULES_STR = """
Do you have udev rules installed?
https://github.com/trezor/trezor-common/blob/master/udev/51-trezor.rules
""".strip()
2018-03-05 13:25:37 +00:00
class TransportException(TrezorException):
pass
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
class Transport:
"""Raw connection to a Trezor device.
Transport subclass represents a kind of communication link: Trezor Bridge, WebUSB
or USB-HID connection, or UDP socket of listening emulator(s).
It can also enumerate devices available over this communication link, and return
them as instances.
Transport instance is a thing that:
- can be identified and requested by a string URI-like path
- can open and close sessions, which enclose related operations
- can read and write protobuf messages
You need to implement a new Transport subclass if you invent a new way to connect
a Trezor device to a computer.
"""
2016-02-10 15:46:58 +00:00
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
PATH_PREFIX = None # type: str
ENABLED = False
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def __str__(self) -> str:
return self.get_path()
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def get_path(self) -> str:
raise NotImplementedError
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def begin_session(self) -> None:
raise NotImplementedError
2016-02-10 15:46:58 +00:00
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def end_session(self) -> None:
raise NotImplementedError
2016-06-26 19:29:29 +00:00
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def read(self) -> MessageType:
raise NotImplementedError
2016-06-26 19:29:29 +00:00
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def write(self, message: MessageType) -> None:
2017-08-24 12:41:31 +00:00
raise NotImplementedError
@classmethod
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def enumerate(cls) -> Iterable["Transport"]:
raise NotImplementedError
@classmethod
trezorlib: transport/protocol reshuffle This commit breaks session handling (which matters with Bridge) and regresses Bridge to an older code state. Both of these issues will be rectified in subsequent commits. Explanation of this big API reshuffle follows: * protocols are moved to trezorlib.transport, and to a single common file. * there is a cleaner definition of Transport and Protocol API (see below) * fully valid mypy type hinting * session handle counters and open handle counters mostly went away. Transports and Protocols are meant to be "raw" APIs; TrezorClient will implement context-handler-based sessions, session tracking, etc. I'm calling this a "reshuffle" because it involved very small number of code changes. Most of it is moving things around where they sit better. The API changes are as follows. Transport is now a thing that can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages * enumerate and find devices Some transports (all except bridge) are technically bytes-based and need a separate protocol implementation (because we have two existing protocols, although only the first one is actually used). Hence a protocol superclass. Protocol is a thing that *also* can: * open and close sessions * read and write protobuf messages For that, it requires a `handle`. Handle is a physical layer for a protocol. It can: * open and close some sort of device connection (this is distinct from session! Connection is a channel over which you can send data. Session is a logical arrangement on top of that; you can have multiple sessions on a single connection.) * read and write 64-byte chunks of data With that, we introduce ProtocolBasedTransport, which simply delegates the appropriate Transport functionality to respective Protocol methods. hid and webusb transports are ProtocolBasedTransport-s that provide separate device handles. HidHandle and WebUsbHandle existed before, but the distinction of functionality between a Transport and its Handle was unclear. Some methods were moved and now the handles implement the Handle API, while the transports provide the enumeration parts of the Transport API, as well as glue between the respective Protocols and Handles. udp transport is also a ProtocolBasedTransport, but it acts as its own handle. (That might be changed. For now, I went with the pre-existing structure.) In addition, session_begin/end is renamed to begin/end_session to keep consistent verb_noun naming.
2018-11-08 14:24:28 +00:00
def find_by_path(cls, path: str, prefix_search: bool = False) -> "Transport":
for device in cls.enumerate():
2018-08-13 16:21:24 +00:00
if (
path is None
or device.get_path() == path
or (prefix_search and device.get_path().startswith(path))
):
return device
2018-08-13 16:21:24 +00:00
raise TransportException(
"{} device not found: {}".format(cls.PATH_PREFIX, path)
)
def all_transports() -> Iterable[Type[Transport]]:
from .bridge import BridgeTransport
from .hid import HidTransport
from .udp import UdpTransport
from .webusb import WebUsbTransport
return set(
cls
for cls in (BridgeTransport, HidTransport, UdpTransport, WebUsbTransport)
if cls.ENABLED
)
def enumerate_devices() -> Iterable[Transport]:
devices = [] # type: List[Transport]
for transport in all_transports():
2018-11-08 14:39:20 +00:00
name = transport.__name__
try:
found = list(transport.enumerate())
2018-11-08 14:39:20 +00:00
LOG.info("Enumerating {}: found {} devices".format(name, len(found)))
devices.extend(found)
except NotImplementedError:
2018-11-08 14:39:20 +00:00
LOG.error("{} does not implement device enumeration".format(name))
except Exception as e:
2018-11-08 14:39:20 +00:00
excname = e.__class__.__name__
LOG.error("Failed to enumerate {}. {}: {}".format(name, excname, e))
return devices
def get_transport(path: str = None, prefix_search: bool = False) -> Transport:
if path is None:
try:
return next(iter(enumerate_devices()))
except IndexError:
raise Exception("No TREZOR device found") from None
# Find whether B is prefix of A (transport name is part of the path)
# or A is prefix of B (path is a prefix, or a name, of transport).
# This naively expects that no two transports have a common prefix.
def match_prefix(a: str, b: str) -> bool:
return a.startswith(b) or b.startswith(a)
2018-08-13 16:21:24 +00:00
LOG.info(
"looking for device by {}: {}".format(
"prefix" if prefix_search else "full path", path
)
)
transports = [t for t in all_transports() if match_prefix(path, t.PATH_PREFIX)]
if transports:
return transports[0].find_by_path(path, prefix_search=prefix_search)
raise Exception("Could not find device by path: {}".format(path))