This is the third part of the [chapter](https://0xax.gitbook.io/linux-insides/summary/interrupts) about interrupts and an exceptions handling in the Linux kernel and in the previous [part](https://0xax.gitbook.io/linux-insides/summary/interrupts) we stopped at the `setup_arch` function from the [arch/x86/kernel/setup.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blame/master/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c) source code file.
We already know that this function executes initialization of architecture-specific stuff. In our case the `setup_arch` function does [x86_64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64) architecture related initializations. The `setup_arch` is big function, and in the previous part we stopped on the setting of the two exception handlers for the two following exceptions:
*`#DB` - debug exception, transfers control from the interrupted process to the debug handler;
*`#BP` - breakpoint exception, caused by the `int 3` instruction.
These exceptions allow the `x86_64` architecture to have early exception processing for the purpose of debugging via the [kgdb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGDB).
As you can remember we set these exceptions handlers in the `early_trap_init` function:
from the [arch/x86/kernel/traps.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c). We already saw implementation of the `set_intr_gate_ist` and `set_system_intr_gate_ist` functions in the previous part and now we will look on the implementation of these two exception handlers.
Ok, we setup exception handlers in the `early_trap_init` function for the `#DB` and `#BP` exceptions and now is time to consider their implementations. But before we will do this, first of all let's look on details of these exceptions.
The first exceptions - `#DB` or `debug` exception occurs when a debug event occurs. For example - attempt to change the contents of a [debug register](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_debug_register). Debug registers are special registers that were presented in `x86` processors starting from the [Intel 80386](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386) processor and as you can understand from name of this CPU extension, main purpose of these registers is debugging.
These registers allow to set breakpoints on the code and read or write data to trace it. Debug registers may be accessed only in the privileged mode and an attempt to read or write the debug registers when executing at any other privilege level causes a [general protection fault](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_protection_fault) exception. That's why we have used `set_intr_gate_ist` for the `#DB` exception, but not the `set_system_intr_gate_ist`.
The second exception is `#BP` or `breakpoint` exception occurs when processor executes the [int 3](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INT_%28x86_instruction%29#INT_3) instruction. Unlike the `DB` exception, the `#BP` exception may occur in userspace. We can add it anywhere in our code, for example let's look on the simple program:
As you may note before, the `set_intr_gate_ist` and `set_system_intr_gate_ist` functions takes an addresses of exceptions handlers in theirs second parameter. In or case our two exception handlers will be:
You will not find these functions in the C code. All of that could be found in the kernel's `*.c/*.h` files only definition of these functions which are located in the [arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h) kernel header file:
You may note `asmlinkage` directive in definitions of these functions. The directive is the special specificator of the [gcc](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_Collection). Actually for a `C` functions which are called from assembly, we need in explicit declaration of the function calling convention. In our case, if function made with `asmlinkage` descriptor, then `gcc` will compile the function to retrieve parameters from stack.
So, both handlers are defined in the [arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S) assembly source code file with the `idtentry` macro:
Each exception handler may consists of two parts. The first part is generic part and it is the same for all exception handlers. An exception handler should to save [general purpose registers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processor_register) on the stack, switch to kernel stack if an exception came from userspace and transfer control to the second part of an exception handler. The second part of an exception handler does certain work depends on certain exception. For example page fault exception handler should find virtual page for given address, invalid opcode exception handler should send `SIGILL` [signal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_signal) and etc.
As we just saw, an exception handler starts from definition of the `idtentry` macro from the [arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S) assembly source code file, so let's look at implementation of this macro. As we may see, the `idtentry` macro takes five arguments:
Before we will consider internals of the `idtentry` macro, we should to know state of stack when an exception occurs. As we may read in the [Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual 3A](http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/architectures-software-developer-manuals.html), the state of stack when an exception occurs is following:
If we will look at these definitions, we may know that compiler will generate two routines with `debug` and `int3` names and both of these exception handlers will call `do_debug` and `do_int3` secondary handlers after some preparation. The third parameter defines existence of error code and as we may see both our exception do not have them. As we may see on the diagram above, processor pushes error code on stack if an exception provides it. In our case, the `debug` and `int3` exception do not have error codes. This may bring some difficulties because stack will look differently for exceptions which provides error code and for exceptions which not. That's why implementation of the `idtentry` macro starts from putting a fake error code to the stack if an exception does not provide it:
But it is not only fake error-code. Moreover the `-1` also represents invalid system call number, so that the system call restart logic will not be triggered.
The last two parameters of the `idtentry` macro `shift_ist` and `paranoid` allow to know do an exception handler runned at stack from `Interrupt Stack Table` or not. You already may know that each kernel thread in the system has its own stack. In addition to these stacks, there are some specialized stacks associated with each processor in the system. One of these stacks is - exception stack. The [x86_64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64) architecture provides special feature which is called - `Interrupt Stack Table`. This feature allows to switch to a new stack for designated events such as an atomic exceptions like `double fault`, etc. So the `shift_ist` parameter allows us to know do we need to switch on `IST` stack for an exception handler or not.
The second parameter - `paranoid` defines the method which helps us to know did we come from userspace or not to an exception handler. The easiest way to determine this is to via `CPL` or `Current Privilege Level` in `CS` segment register. If it is equal to `3`, we came from userspace, if zero we came from kernel space:
In other words for example `NMI` could happen inside the critical section of a [swapgs](http://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/SWAPGS.html) instruction. In this way we should check value of the `MSR_GS_BASE` [model specific register](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-specific_register) which stores pointer to the start of per-cpu area. So to check if we did come from userspace or not, we should to check value of the `MSR_GS_BASE` model specific register and if it is negative we came from kernel space, in other way we came from userspace:
In first two lines of code we read value of the `MSR_GS_BASE` model specific register into `edx:eax` pair. We can't set negative value to the `gs` from userspace. But from other side we know that direct mapping of the physical memory starts from the `0xffff880000000000` virtual address. In this way, `MSR_GS_BASE` will contain an address from `0xffff880000000000` to `0xffffc7ffffffffff`. After the `rdmsr` instruction will be executed, the smallest possible value in the `%edx` register will be - `0xffff8800` which is `-30720` in unsigned 4 bytes. That's why kernel space `gs` which points to start of `per-cpu` area will contain negative value.
macro which is defined in the [arch/x86/entry/calling.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/entry/calling.h) header file. This macro just allocates 15*8 bytes space on the stack to preserve general purpose registers:
So the stack will look like this after execution of the `ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK`:
```
+------------+
+160 | %SS |
+152 | %RSP |
+144 | %RFLAGS |
+136 | %CS |
+128 | %RIP |
+120 | ERROR CODE |
|------------|
+112 | |
+104 | |
+96 | |
+88 | |
+80 | |
+72 | |
+64 | |
+56 | |
+48 | |
+40 | |
+32 | |
+24 | |
+16 | |
+8 | |
+0 | | <-%RSP
+------------+
```
After we allocated space for general purpose registers, we do some checks to understand did an exception come from userspace or not and if yes, we should move back to an interrupted process stack or stay on exception stack:
In the first let's consider a case when an exception has `paranoid=1` like our `debug` and `int3` exceptions. In this case we check selector from `CS` segment register and jump at `1f` label if we came from userspace or the `paranoid_entry` will be called in other way.
Let's consider first case when we came from userspace to an exception handler. As described above we should jump at `1` label. The `1` label starts from the call of the
```assembly
call error_entry
```
routine which saves all general purpose registers in the previously allocated area on the stack:
These both macros are defined in the [arch/x86/entry/calling.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/entry/calling.h) header file and just move values of general purpose registers to a certain place at the stack, for example:
because we may have potentially fault if as described in documentation truncated `%RIP` was reported. Anyway, in both cases the [SWAPGS](http://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/SWAPGS.html) instruction will be executed and values from `MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE` and `MSR_GS_BASE` will be swapped. From this moment the `%gs` register will point to the base address of kernel structures. So, the `SWAPGS` instruction is called and it was main point of the `error_entry` routing.
Now we can back to the `idtentry` macro. We may see following assembler code after the call of `error_entry`:
Here we put base address of stack pointer `%rdi` register which will be first argument (according to [x86_64 ABI](https://www.uclibc.org/docs/psABI-x86_64.pdf)) of the `sync_regs` function and call this function which is defined in the [arch/x86/kernel/traps.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c) source code file:
This function takes the result of the `task_ptr_regs` macro which is defined in the [arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h) header file, stores it in the stack pointer and returns it. The `task_ptr_regs` macro expands to the address of `thread.sp0` which represents pointer to the normal kernel stack:
As we came from userspace, this means that exception handler will run in real process context. After we got stack pointer from the `sync_regs` we switch stack:
2. Pass error code to the `%rsi` register as it will be second argument of an exception handler and set it to `-1` on the stack for the same purpose as we did it before - to prevent restart of a system call:
will be for `int 3` exception. In this part we will not see implementations of secondary handlers, because they are very specific, but will see some of them in one of next parts.
In this case an exception was occurred in kernelspace and `idtentry` macro is defined with `paranoid=1` for this exception. This value of `paranoid` means that we should use slower way that we saw in the beginning of this part to check do we really came from kernelspace or not. The `paranoid_entry` routing allows us to know this:
As you may see, this function represents the same that we covered before. We use second (slow) method to get information about previous state of an interrupted task. As we checked this and executed `SWAPGS` in a case if we came from userspace, we should to do the same that we did before: We need to put pointer to a structure which holds general purpose registers to the `%rdi` (which will be first parameter of a secondary handler) and put error code if an exception provides it to the `%rsi` (which will be second parameter of a secondary handler):
You may remember that we passed the `shift_ist` as argument of the `idtentry` macro. Here we check its value and if its not equal to `-1`, we get pointer to a stack from `Interrupt Stack Table` by `shift_ist` index and setup it.
The last method is similar to previous both, but an exception occurred with `paranoid=0` and we may use fast method determination of where we are from.
routine. The `error_exit` function defined in the same [arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/16f73eb02d7e1765ccab3d2018e0bd98eb93d973/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S) assembly source code file and the main goal of this function is to know where we are from (from userspace or kernelspace) and execute `SWPAGS` depends on this. Restore registers to previous state and execute `iret` instruction to transfer control to an interrupted task.
It is the end of the third part about interrupts and interrupt handling in the Linux kernel. We saw the initialization of the [Interrupt descriptor table](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt_descriptor_table) in the previous part with the `#DB` and `#BP` gates and started to dive into preparation before control will be transferred to an exception handler and implementation of some interrupt handlers in this part. In the next part we will continue to dive into this theme and will go next by the `setup_arch` function and will try to understand interrupts handling related stuff.
**Please note that English is not my first language, And I am really sorry for any inconvenience. If you find any mistakes please send me PR to [linux-insides](https://github.com/0xAX/linux-insides).**
