2016-06-18 18:29:58 +00:00
|
|
|
BUILD INSTRUCTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To build this, you'll need to remove my key.* settings in ant.properties.
|
2016-06-18 19:13:01 +00:00
|
|
|
You'll have to build a "debug" apk instead of a "release" one. Android
|
|
|
|
will not let you install a debug apk on top of a release one, so you have
|
|
|
|
to remove stock SimpleSSHD first before installing the debug build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then follow these steps (roughly the "doit" script):
|
2016-06-18 18:29:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ndk-build -j8 &&
|
|
|
|
mv libs/armeabi/scp libs/armeabi/libscp.so &&
|
|
|
|
mv libs/armeabi/sftp-server libs/armeabi/libsftp-server.so &&
|
|
|
|
mv libs/armeabi/rsync libs/armeabi/librsync.so &&
|
|
|
|
mv libs/armeabi/buffersu libs/armeabi/libbuffersu.so &&
|
2016-06-18 19:13:01 +00:00
|
|
|
ant debug
|
2016-06-18 18:29:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-06-18 19:13:01 +00:00
|
|
|
The mv steps are very important, because ant will only package the
|
|
|
|
necessary binaries if they have a .so extension (even though they are
|
2016-06-18 18:29:58 +00:00
|
|
|
stand alone executables).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-06 16:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
December 6, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is to make a proper ssh implementation for Android. Important
|
|
|
|
features:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* it should run happily without root (on a non-root port)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* it should be a regular android app requiring no special permissions,
|
|
|
|
and not requiring any 'magic' executable files
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* should not rely on busybox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* preferably support sftp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* open source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The existing apps are either expensive, don't work, need root, or too
|
|
|
|
complicated, or a mix of all of the above. And none of them are open
|
|
|
|
source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I figure I'll start with dropbear, which I will run through JNI instead
|
|
|
|
of putting it in its own binary (because making such a binary executable
|
|
|
|
is a bit of a hack).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So that's the plan........
|
2014-12-14 21:57:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 14, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I got dropbear to compile under the Android NDK, so now it's time to work
|
|
|
|
on the Android side of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I need:
|
|
|
|
* a Service that can be started, stopped, and queried for whether it's
|
|
|
|
running or not
|
|
|
|
* a Thread to implement the Service's work (by calling into dropbear's
|
|
|
|
main()), which can also be stopped.
|
|
|
|
* a config UI with at least these choices:
|
2014-12-14 22:30:35 +00:00
|
|
|
- bool: start on boot (def: false)
|
2014-12-14 21:57:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- number: port number (def: 2222)
|
|
|
|
- string: path to authorized_keys file (def: /sdcard/ssh)
|
|
|
|
- string: name of default shell (def: /system/bin/sh -l)
|
|
|
|
- string: default path for HOME (def: /sdcard/ssh)
|
|
|
|
- button: start or (if it's running) stop
|
2014-12-16 04:27:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 15, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Getting to the fun part. Process management...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To start sshd, it seems like I can startService(). Then in the Service's
|
|
|
|
onStartCommand(), call startForeground() so it won't be killed (return
|
|
|
|
START_STICKY too?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question is if dropbear's main() should run under a separate Thread,
|
|
|
|
or a separate Process. The trouble with a Thread is that it might be
|
|
|
|
hard to kill. The trouble with a process is that there is no way to
|
|
|
|
report back status (such as a failure to start sshd).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connectbot starts a new process for its shell -- it really doesn't have a
|
|
|
|
choice because the shell binary isn't linked with Connectbot, and exec()
|
|
|
|
in a thread stinks. To stop it, it just closes stdin/stdout!!! So
|
|
|
|
zombies can (and do) linger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose dropbear could be in its own process if it had something like
|
|
|
|
stdin/stdout to communicate failure? Or it could just write error
|
|
|
|
messages to (i.e.) /sdcard/ssh/log. To stop the service, it would just
|
|
|
|
use kill().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am curious how the main waiting-for-connections loop looks, but even if
|
|
|
|
it uses select(), I'm not sure how I would honor Thread.interrupt() or
|
|
|
|
whatever. It's not guaranteed to interrupt select(), and I'm not keen on
|
|
|
|
adding an arbitrary timeout/polling feature to it.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-21 03:53:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 20, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, I added a builtin scp endpoint. It was pretty straight forward,
|
|
|
|
except dropbear defaults to vfork(), which blocks the parent until the
|
|
|
|
child runs execve()!!
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-21 13:34:17 +00:00
|
|
|
Anyways, I noticed that scp doesn't quote its arguments to the remote
|
|
|
|
scp. That means you can't conveniently copy a remote file with a space in
|
2014-12-21 03:53:07 +00:00
|
|
|
its name (it becomes two files). But the upside is that this is where
|
|
|
|
wildcards are handled -- by the shell!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So I need to either run it as a separate executable launched through the
|
|
|
|
shell, or make my own implementation of wildcards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is easy, using a $(BUILD_EXECUTABLE) script, to get ndk to build an
|
|
|
|
executable. But it is only packaged up if it is named "gdbserver" (and
|
|
|
|
debug apk), or "libfoo.so". The good news is that libfoo.so can be
|
|
|
|
executed in /data/data/org.galexander.sshd/lib/libfoo.so, so that is a
|
|
|
|
viable option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doing the expansion myself is not necessarily hard either, though. I
|
|
|
|
need a library function called glob(), which is apparently not part of
|
|
|
|
bionic. But I have the idea some cut and paste would resolve that with
|
|
|
|
very little extra work on my part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-21 13:34:17 +00:00
|
|
|
December 21, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, bionic libc *does* provide fnmatch(), and even scandir() (a
|
|
|
|
shortcut for readdir). In the best case, though, that still leaves me
|
|
|
|
with a bit of a path parsing conundrum (I have to tell scandir which
|
|
|
|
directory to operate on). And also a bit of an escape character
|
|
|
|
conundrum -- \* and "*" should not act like wildcards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those are not insurmountable but I think I've talked myself out of it.
|
|
|
|
So then the question is, do I figure out how to ship an executable, or
|
|
|
|
do I do some hack like open a pipe to "/system/bin/sh echo filespec" and
|
|
|
|
use the shell solely for expansion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm developing the idea that it's actually pretty easy to ship an
|
|
|
|
executable, I just need to find some -pre-package step where I can do
|
|
|
|
"mv scp libscp.so" and then it will ship. ndk-build will not let me make
|
|
|
|
a target with a "." in it directly.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-22 04:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
...
|
2014-12-21 03:53:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-22 04:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
Now scp, sftp-server, and rsync work as separate executables... rsync
|
|
|
|
does fail at -z because it needs it's own custom zlib...The stock
|
|
|
|
"external" one seems to lack the "old-style compress" method. There is
|
|
|
|
another commandline option for the new (deflate?) technique, but I think
|
|
|
|
the normal -z ought to work too. But that is literally the last feature!
|
|
|
|
Then just release details.
|
2014-12-23 18:14:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-29 21:19:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First problem report from a user. Lollipop (Android 5.0) requires "PIE"
|
|
|
|
executables -- position independent code. I think that is a modern
|
|
|
|
equivalent to -fpic that Android is now requiring so that it can
|
|
|
|
randomize addresses to try to obscure stack smashing attacks that rely on
|
|
|
|
fixed addresses. It is epicly lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyways, the big fuck-you from Google is that Ice Cream Sandwich (Android
|
|
|
|
4.1) and earlier require fixed-position code. So one binary will not
|
|
|
|
generally work on both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a good summary:
|
|
|
|
https://code.google.com/p/android-developer-preview/issues/detail?id=888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is something called "run_pie" which you can wrap your executables
|
|
|
|
in that lets older Android run PIE executables. It would require a
|
|
|
|
relatively small change to the exec() call to prepend it with "run_pie".
|
|
|
|
That seems like a hack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The suggested remedy is to build two different apks! Yuck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyways, it is only executables (not libraries -- they are position
|
|
|
|
independent already) that are affected. And apparently static
|
|
|
|
executables don't care one way or the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So that is my remedy -- static executables for the moment. I tested them
|
|
|
|
and it is only a little bit bigger -- 904kB of binaries instead of 668kB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-18 21:26:36 +00:00
|
|
|
January 18, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markus Ethen suggested it display the current IP address so you know
|
|
|
|
where to ssh to, in case it isn't convenient to use static dhcp or to
|
|
|
|
remember the address. That seems to be easier said than done. You can
|
|
|
|
use WifiManager, but that won't give your IP address unless you're on
|
|
|
|
wifi. That is probably "good enough", but it is certainly not ideal.
|
|
|
|
There is also java.net.NetworkInterface, which seems to return a random
|
|
|
|
ipv6 address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah-hah! It is fe80::macaddr, which is a bogus "local-connection only"
|
|
|
|
ipv6 address, like 192.168, but automatically-generated without dhcp.
|
|
|
|
So if I skip that, it finds the proper ipv4 address!
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-18 21:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
Pfew! I was thinking I'd have to directly use /proc/net/dev and
|
|
|
|
SIOCGIFCONF, just like ifconfig does, but it works fine with
|
|
|
|
java.net.NetworkInterface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-20 17:52:34 +00:00
|
|
|
June 20, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At some points, rsync is only write()ing, and assumes that the other end
|
|
|
|
will receive it all. The other end does a little bit of write()ing of
|
|
|
|
its own, and then is happy to read() all it wants. So this written stuff
|
|
|
|
may sit in a buffer somewhere indefinitely. If that happens, an
|
|
|
|
infelicity in the design of SuperSU causes everything to wedge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, this is only if you set the shell to /system/xbin/su as a way
|
|
|
|
of having root access for rsync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyways, I made a new program, "buffersu", which is just a
|
2016-06-22 01:14:00 +00:00
|
|
|
stdin/stdout-buffering wrapper for rsync that is guaranteed to always
|
2015-06-20 17:52:34 +00:00
|
|
|
perform any read() that is possible at any time, no matter how many
|
|
|
|
write()s are outstanding. That seems to do the trick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-22 01:14:00 +00:00
|
|
|
June 21, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Moore reports that rsync and sftp do not like files larger than 2GB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rsync was easy - it just needed an additional #define in rsync/config.h
|
|
|
|
to enable its builtin support for using stat64/lseek64/off64_t/etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that I'm investigating sftp, I find this surprising fact about bionic
|
|
|
|
(though the glibc man page for stat(2) tried to tell me this) - stat64
|
|
|
|
and stat are the same thing! But off64_t and lseek64 are significant.
|
|
|
|
That should make converting sftp pretty convenient. Especially since
|
|
|
|
sftp already uses "u_int64_t" instead of off_t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p.s. Chris Moore gave me this command to test sftp, which turned out to
|
|
|
|
be useful:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
curl -v --pubkey .ssh/id_rsa.pub -r 2147482624-2147484672 -k sftp://mushroom:2222/sdcard/ssh/buh -o buh-new
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-22 01:24:37 +00:00
|
|
|
As for scp, it's not as clear what needs to be done. It doesn't use
|
|
|
|
lseek. But it does use off_t a bit, including on an index in a for loop
|
|
|
|
that is compared against st_size (which is 64-bit). So I'll just change
|
|
|
|
all of the off_t to off64_t and hope for the best.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-22 01:25:24 +00:00
|
|
|
sftp and rsync work! Not gonna bother testing scp on big files...
|
2016-06-22 01:14:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-18 19:51:23 +00:00
|
|
|
XXX - if you remove it from the recent apps list, does it stop the service??
|
2014-12-23 18:14:17 +00:00
|
|
|
XXX - support password-based logins?
|