Synchronization primitives in the Linux kernel. Part 1. ================================================================================ Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This part opens a new chapter in the [linux-insides](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/) book. Timers and time management related stuff was described in the previous [chapter](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Timers/index.html). Now time to go next. As you may understand from the part's title, this chapter will describe [synchronization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_%28computer_science%29) primitives in the Linux kernel. As always, before we will consider something synchronization related, we will try to know what `synchronization primitive` is in general. Actually, synchronization primitive is a software mechanism which provides the ability to two or more [parallel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_computing) processes or threads to not execute simultaneously on the same segment of a code. For example, let's look on the following piece of code: ```C mutex_lock(&clocksource_mutex); ... ... ... clocksource_enqueue(cs); clocksource_enqueue_watchdog(cs); clocksource_select(); ... ... ... mutex_unlock(&clocksource_mutex); ``` from the [kernel/time/clocksource.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/time/clocksource.c) source code file. This code is from the `__clocksource_register_scale` function which adds the given [clocksource](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Timers/linux-timers-2.html) to the clock sources list. This function produces different operations on a list with registered clock sources. For example, the `clocksource_enqueue` function adds the given clock source to the list with registered clocksources - `clocksource_list`. Note that these lines of code wrapped to two functions: `mutex_lock` and `mutex_unlock` which takes one parameter - the `clocksource_mutex` in our case. These functions represent locking and unlocking based on [mutex](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_exclusion) synchronization primitive. As `mutex_lock` will be executed, it allows us to prevent the situation when two or more threads will execute this code while the `mutex_unlock` will not be executed by process-owner of the mutex. In other words, we prevent parallel operations on a `clocksource_list`. Why do we need `mutex` here? What if two parallel processes will try to register a clock source. As we already know, the `clocksource_enqueue` function adds the given clock source to the `clocksource_list` list right after a clock source in the list which has the biggest rating (a registered clock source which has the highest frequency in the system): ```C static void clocksource_enqueue(struct clocksource *cs) { struct list_head *entry = &clocksource_list; struct clocksource *tmp; list_for_each_entry(tmp, &clocksource_list, list) { if (tmp->rating < cs->rating) break; entry = &tmp->list; } list_add(&cs->list, entry); } ``` If two parallel processes will try to do it simultaneously, both process may found the same `entry` may occur [race condition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition) or in other words, the second process which will execute `list_add`, will overwrite a clock source from the first thread. Besides this simple example, synchronization primitives are ubiquitous in the Linux kernel. If we will go through the previous [chapter](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Timers/index.html) or other chapters again or if we will look at the Linux kernel source code in general, we will meet many places like this. We will not consider how `mutex` is implemented in the Linux kernel. Actually, the Linux kernel provides a set of different synchronization primitives like: * `mutex`; * `semaphores`; * `seqlocks`; * `atomic operations`; * etc. We will start this chapter from the `spinlock`. Spinlocks in the Linux kernel. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The `spinlock` is a low-level synchronization mechanism which in simple words, represents a variable which can be in two states: * `acquired`; * `released`. Each process which wants to acquire a `spinlock`, must write a value which represents `spinlock acquired` state to this variable and write `spinlock released` state to the variable. If a process tries to execute code which is protected by a `spinlock`, it will be locked while a process which holds this lock will release it. In this case all related operations must be [atomic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linearizability) to prevent [race conditions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition) state. The `spinlock` is represented by the `spinlock_t` type in the Linux kernel. If we will look at the Linux kernel code, we will see that this type is [widely](http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=spinlock_t) used. The `spinlock_t` is defined as: ```C typedef struct spinlock { union { struct raw_spinlock rlock; #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC # define LOCK_PADSIZE (offsetof(struct raw_spinlock, dep_map)) struct { u8 __padding[LOCK_PADSIZE]; struct lockdep_map dep_map; }; #endif }; } spinlock_t; ``` and located in the [include/linux/spinlock_types.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock_types.h) header file. We may see that its implementation depends on the state of the `CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC` kernel configuration option. We will skip this now, because all debugging related stuff will be in the end of this part. So, if the `CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC` kernel configuration option is disabled, the `spinlock_t` contains [union](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_type#C.2FC.2B.2B) with one field which is - `raw_spinlock`: ```C typedef struct spinlock { union { struct raw_spinlock rlock; }; } spinlock_t; ``` The `raw_spinlock` structure defined in the [same](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock_types.h) header file represents the implementation of `normal` spinlock. Let's look how the `raw_spinlock` structure is defined: ```C typedef struct raw_spinlock { arch_spinlock_t raw_lock; #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK unsigned int magic, owner_cpu; void *owner; #endif #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC struct lockdep_map dep_map; #endif } raw_spinlock_t; ``` where the `arch_spinlock_t` represents architecture-specific `spinlock` implementation. As we mentioned above, we will skip debugging kernel configuration options. As we focus on [x86_64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64) architecture in this book, the `arch_spinlock_t` that we will consider is defined in the [include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h) header file and looks: ```C typedef struct qspinlock { union { atomic_t val; struct { u8 locked; u8 pending; }; struct { u16 locked_pending; u16 tail; }; }; } arch_spinlock_t; ``` We will not stop on this structures for now. Let's look at the operations on a `spinlock`. The Linux kernel provides following main operations on a `spinlock`: * `spin_lock_init` - produces initialization of the given `spinlock`; * `spin_lock` - acquires given `spinlock`; * `spin_lock_bh` - disables software [interrupts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt) and acquire given `spinlock`; * `spin_lock_irqsave` and `spin_lock_irq` - disable interrupts on local processor, preserve/not preserve previous interrupt state in the `flags` and acquire given `spinlock`; * `spin_unlock` - releases given `spinlock`; * `spin_unlock_bh` - releases given `spinlock` and enables software interrupts; * `spin_is_locked` - returns the state of the given `spinlock`; * and etc. Let's look on the implementation of the `spin_lock_init` macro. As I already wrote, this and other macro are defined in the [include/linux/spinlock.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock.h) header file and the `spin_lock_init` macro looks: ```C #define spin_lock_init(_lock) \ do { \ spinlock_check(_lock); \ raw_spin_lock_init(&(_lock)->rlock); \ } while (0) ``` As we may see, the `spin_lock_init` macro takes a `spinlock` and executes two operations: check the given `spinlock` and execute the `raw_spin_lock_init`. The implementation of the `spinlock_check` is pretty easy, this function just returns the `raw_spinlock_t` of the given `spinlock` to be sure that we got exactly `normal` raw spinlock: ```C static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t *lock) { return &lock->rlock; } ``` The `raw_spin_lock_init` macro: ```C # define raw_spin_lock_init(lock) \ do { \ *(lock) = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lock); \ } while (0) \ ``` assigns the value of the `__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED` with the given `spinlock` to the given `raw_spinlock_t`. As we may understand from the name of the `__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED` macro, this macro does initialization of the given `spinlock` and set it to `released` state. This macro is defined in the [include/linux/spinlock_types.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock_types.h) header file and expands to the following macros: ```C #define __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \ (raw_spinlock_t) __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(lockname) #define __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(lockname) \ { \ .raw_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, \ SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) \ SPIN_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) \ } ``` As I already wrote above, we will not consider stuff which is related to debugging of synchronization primitives. In this case we will not consider the `SPIN_DEBUG_INIT` and the `SPIN_DEP_MAP_INIT` macros. So the `__RAW_SPINLOCK_UNLOCKED` macro will be expanded to the: ```C *(&(_lock)->rlock) = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; ``` where the `__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED` is: ```C #define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED { { .val = ATOMIC_INIT(0) } } ``` for the [x86_64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64) architecture. So, after the expansion of the `spin_lock_init` macro, a given `spinlock` will be initialized and its state will be - `unlocked`. From this moment we know how to initialize a `spinlock`, now let's consider [API](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface) which Linux kernel provides for manipulations of `spinlocks`. The first is: ```C static __always_inline void spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock) { raw_spin_lock(&lock->rlock); } ``` function which allows us to `acquire` a `spinlock`. The `raw_spin_lock` macro is defined in the same header file and expands to the call of `_raw_spin_lock`: ```C #define raw_spin_lock(lock) _raw_spin_lock(lock) ``` Where `_raw_spin_lock` is defined depends on whether `CONFIG_SMP` option is set and `CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK` option is set. If the [SMP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_multiprocessing) is disabled, `_raw_spin_lock` is defined in the [include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h) header file as a macro and looks like: ```C #define _raw_spin_lock(lock) __LOCK(lock) ``` If the SMP is enabled and `CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK` is set, it is defined in [include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h) header file as the following: ```C #define _raw_spin_lock(lock) __raw_spin_lock(lock) ``` If the SMP is enabled and `CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK` is not set, it is defined in [kernel/locking/spinlock.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/locking/spinlock.c) source code file as the following: ```C void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { __raw_spin_lock(lock); } ``` Here we will consider the latter form of `_raw_spin_lock`. The `__raw_spin_lock` function looks: ```C static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { preempt_disable(); spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, do_raw_spin_trylock, do_raw_spin_lock); } ``` As you may see, first of all we disable [preemption](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preemption_%28computing%29) by the call of the `preempt_disable` macro from the [include/linux/preempt.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/preempt.h) (more about this you may read in the ninth [part](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Initialization/linux-initialization-9.html) of the Linux kernel initialization process chapter). When we unlock the given `spinlock`, preemption will be enabled again: ```C static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) { ... ... ... preempt_enable(); } ``` We need to do this to prevent the process from other processes to preempt it while it is spinning on a lock. The `spin_acquire` macro which through a chain of other macros expands to the call of the: ```C #define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, NULL, i) #define lock_acquire_exclusive(l, s, t, n, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, n, i) ``` The `lock_acquire` function: ```C void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int trylock, int read, int check, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip) { unsigned long flags; if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion)) return; raw_local_irq_save(flags); check_flags(flags); current->lockdep_recursion = 1; trace_lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, nest_lock, ip); __lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0); current->lockdep_recursion = 0; raw_local_irq_restore(flags); } ``` As I wrote above, we will not consider stuff here which is related to debugging or tracing. The main point of the `lock_acquire` function is to disable hardware interrupts by the call of the `raw_local_irq_save` macro, because the given spinlock might be acquired with enabled hardware interrupts. In this way the process will not be preempted. Note that in the end of the `lock_acquire` function we will enable hardware interrupts again with the help of the `raw_local_irq_restore` macro. As you already may guess, the main work will be in the `__lock_acquire` function which is defined in the [kernel/locking/lockdep.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/locking/lockdep.c) source code file. The `__lock_acquire` function looks big. We will try to understand what this function does, but not in this part. Actually this function is mostly related to the Linux kernel [lock validator](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt) and it is not topic of this part. If we will return to the definition of the `__raw_spin_lock` function, we will see that it contains the following definition in the end: ```C LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, do_raw_spin_trylock, do_raw_spin_lock); ``` The `LOCK_CONTENDED` macro is defined in the [include/linux/lockdep.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/lockdep.h) header file and just calls the given function with the given `spinlock`: ```C #define LOCK_CONTENDED(_lock, try, lock) \ lock(_lock) ``` In our case, the `lock` is `do_raw_spin_lock` function from the [include/linux/spinlock.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/spnlock.h) header file and the `_lock` is the given `raw_spinlock_t`: ```C static inline void do_raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock) { __acquire(lock); arch_spin_lock(&lock->raw_lock); } ``` The `__acquire` here is just [Sparse](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse) related macro and we are not interested in it in this moment. The `arch_spin_lock` macro is defined in the [include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/asm-generic/qspinlocks.h) header file as the following: ```C #define arch_spin_lock(l) queued_spin_lock(l) ``` We stop here for this part. In the next part, we'll dive into how queued spinlocks works and related concepts. Conclusion -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This concludes the first part covering synchronization primitives in the Linux kernel. In this part, we met first synchronization primitive `spinlock` provided by the Linux kernel. In the next part we will continue to dive into this interesting theme and will see other `synchronization` related stuff. If you have questions or suggestions, feel free to ping me in twitter [0xAX](https://twitter.com/0xAX), drop me [email](anotherworldofworld@gmail.com) or just create [issue](https://github.com/0xAX/linux-insides/issues/new). **Please note that English is not my first language and I am really sorry for any inconvenience. If you found any mistakes please send me PR to [linux-insides](https://github.com/0xAX/linux-insides).** Links -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * [Concurrent computing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrent_computing) * [Synchronization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_%28computer_science%29) * [Clocksource framework](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Timers/linux-timers-2.html) * [Mutex](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_exclusion) * [Race condition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition) * [Atomic operations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linearizability) * [SMP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_multiprocessing) * [x86_64](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64) * [Interrupts](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt) * [Preemption](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preemption_%28computing%29) * [Linux kernel lock validator](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt) * [Sparse](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse) * [xadd instruction](http://x86.renejeschke.de/html/file_module_x86_id_327.html) * [NOP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOP) * [Memory barriers](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt) * [Previous chapter](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Timers/index.html)