arno/linux-insides
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/0xAX/linux-insides.git synced 2024-12-22 22:58:08 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

additionaly -> additionally

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Alex Gonzalez 2016-07-10 11:17:22 -07:00
parent 1296c76929
commit dffbc63f44
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
SyncPrim/sync-6.md
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Sequential lock
So, what is it `seqlock` synchronization primitive and how it works? Let's try to answer on these questions in this paragraph. Actually `sequential locks` were introduced in the Linux kernel 2.6.x. Main point of this synchronization primitive is to provide fast and lock-free access to shared resource. Since the heart of `sequential lock` synchronization primitive is [spinlock](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/SyncPrim/sync-1.html) synchronization primitive, `sequential locks` work in situations where the protected resources are small and simple. Additionally write access must be rare and also should be fast. So, what is it `seqlock` synchronization primitive and how it works? Let's try to answer on these questions in this paragraph. Actually `sequential locks` were introduced in the Linux kernel 2.6.x. Main point of this synchronization primitive is to provide fast and lock-free access to shared resource. Since the heart of `sequential lock` synchronization primitive is [spinlock](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/SyncPrim/sync-1.html) synchronization primitive, `sequential locks` work in situations where the protected resources are small and simple. Additionally write access must be rare and also should be fast.
Work of this synchronization primitive is based on the sequence of events counter. Actually a `sequential lock` allows to free access to a resource for readers, but each reader must check existence of conflicts with a writer. This synchronization primitive introduces special counter. The main algorithm of work of `sequential locks` is simple: Each writer which acquired a sequential lock increments this counter and additionaly acquires a [spinlock](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/SyncPrim/sync-1.html). When this writer will finish, it will release acquired spinlock to give access to other writers and increment the counter of a sequential lock again. Work of this synchronization primitive is based on the sequence of events counter. Actually a `sequential lock` allows to free access to a resource for readers, but each reader must check existence of conflicts with a writer. This synchronization primitive introduces special counter. The main algorithm of work of `sequential locks` is simple: Each writer which acquired a sequential lock increments this counter and additionally acquires a [spinlock](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/SyncPrim/sync-1.html). When this writer will finish, it will release acquired spinlock to give access to other writers and increment the counter of a sequential lock again.
Read only access works on the following principle gets value of a `sequential lock` counter before it will enter into [critical section](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_section) and compares it with the value of the same `sequential lock` counter at the exit of critical section. If their values are equal, this means that there weren't writers for this period. If their values are not equal, this means that a writer has incremented the counter during the [critical section](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_section). This conflict means that reading of protected data must be repeated. Read only access works on the following principle gets value of a `sequential lock` counter before it will enter into [critical section](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_section) and compares it with the value of the same `sequential lock` counter at the exit of critical section. If their values are equal, this means that there weren't writers for this period. If their values are not equal, this means that a writer has incremented the counter during the [critical section](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_section). This conflict means that reading of protected data must be repeated.