arno
/
linux-insides
mirror of https://github.com/0xAX/linux-insides.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Create interrupts-9.md

Browse Source
pull/158/head
0xAX 9 years ago
parent 501f0dc269
commit 57deafd20a
1 changed files with 515 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File

515
interrupts/interrupts-9.md
Unescape View File

@ -0,0 +1,515 @@
Interrupts and Interrupt Handling. Part 9.
================================================================================
Introduction to deferred interrupts (Softirq, Tasklets and irqs)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the ninth part of the [linux-insides](https://www.gitbook.com/book/0xax/linux-insides/details) book and in the previous [Previous part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/interrupts/interrupts-8.html) we saw implementation of the `init_IRQ` from that defined in the [arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c) source code file. So, we will continue to dive into the initialization stuff which is related to the external hardware interrupts in this part.
After the `init_IRQ` function we can see the call of the `softirq_init` function in the [init/main.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/init/main.c). This function defined in the [kernel/softirq.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/softirq.c) source code file and as we can understand from its name, this function makes initialization of the `softirq` or in other words initialization of the `deferred interrupts`. What is it deferreed intrrupt? We already saw a little bit about it in the ninth [part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Initialization/linux-initialization-9.html) of the chapter that describes initialization process of the Linux kernel. There are three types of `deffered interrupts` in the Linux kernel:
* `softirqs`;
* `tasklets`;
* `workqueues`;
And we will see description of all of these types in this part. As I said, we saw only a little bit about this theme, so, now is time to dive deep into details about this theme.
Deferred interrupts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interrupts may have different important characteristics and there are two among them:
* Handler of an interrupt must execute quickly;
* Sometime an interrupt handler must do a large amount of work.
As you can understand, it is almost impossible to make so that both characteristics were valid. Because of these, previously the handling of interrupts was splitted into two parts:
* Top half;
* Bottom half;
Once the Linux kernel was one of the ways the organization postprocessing, and which was called: `the bottom half` of the processor, but now it is already not actual. Now this term has remained as a common noun referring to all the different ways of organizing deffered processing of an interrupt. With the advent of parallelisms in the Linux kernel, all new schemes of implementation of the bottom half handlers are built on the performance of the processor specific kernel thread that called `ksoftirqd` (will be discussed below). The `softirq` mechanism represents handling of interrupts that are `almost` important as the handling of the hardware interrupts. The deferred processing of an interrupt suggests that some of the actions for an interrupt may be postponed to a later execution when the system will be less loaded. As you can suggests, an interrupt handler can do large amount of work that is impermissible as it executes in the context where interrupts are disabled. That's why processing of an interrupt can be splitted on two different parts. In the first part, the main handler of an interrupt does only minimal and the most important job. After this it schedules the second part and finishes its work. When the system less busy and context of the processor allows to handle interrupts, the second part starts its work and finishes to process remaing part of a deferred interrupt. That is main explanation of the deferred interrupt handling.
As I already wrote above, handling of deferred interrupts (or `softirq` in other words) and accordingly `tasklets` provided by a set of the special kernel threads (one thread per processor). Each processor has own thread and it is called `ksoftirqd/n` where the `n` is the number of the processor. We can see it in the output of the `systemd-cgls` util:
```
$ systemd-cgls -k | grep ksoft
├─ 3 [ksoftirqd/0]
├─ 13 [ksoftirqd/1]
├─ 18 [ksoftirqd/2]
├─ 23 [ksoftirqd/3]
├─ 28 [ksoftirqd/4]
├─ 33 [ksoftirqd/5]
├─ 38 [ksoftirqd/6]
├─ 43 [ksoftirqd/7]
```
The `spawn_ksoftirqd` function starts this these threads. As we can see this function called as early [initcall](http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/kernelnewbies/documents/initcall/index.html):
```C
early_initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
```
Deferred interrupts are determined statically at compile-time Linux kernel and the `open_softirq` function takes care of `softirq` initialization. The `open_softirq` function defined in the [kernel/softirq.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/softirq.c):
```C
void open_softirq(int nr, void (*action)(struct softirq_action *))
{
softirq_vec[nr].action = action;
}
```
and as we can see this function uses two parameters:
* the index of the `softirq_vec` array;
* a pointer to the softirq function to be executed;
First of all let's look on the `softirq_vec` array:
```C
static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
```
it defined in the same source code file. As we can see, the `softirq_vec` array may contain `NR_SOFTIRQS` or `10` types of `softirqs` that has type - `softirq_action`. First of all about its elements. In the actual version of the Linux kernel there are ten softirq vectors defined; two for tasklet processing, two for networking, two for the block layer, two for timers, and one each for the scheduler and read-copy-update processing. All of these kinds represented by the following enum:
```C
enum
{
HI_SOFTIRQ=0,
TIMER_SOFTIRQ,
NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
BLOCK_SOFTIRQ,
BLOCK_IOPOLL_SOFTIRQ,
TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
SCHED_SOFTIRQ,
HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ,
RCU_SOFTIRQ,
NR_SOFTIRQS
};
```
All names of these kinds of softirqs represented by the following array:
```C
const char * const softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {
"HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL",
"TASKLET", "SCHED", "HRTIMER", "RCU"
};
```
Or we can see it in the output of the `/proc/softirqs`:
```
~$ cat /proc/softirqs
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
HI: 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TIMER: 332519 310498 289555 272913 282535 279467 282895 270979
NET_TX: 2320 0 0 2 1 1 0 0
NET_RX: 270221 225 338 281 311 262 430 265
BLOCK: 134282 32 40 10 12 7 8 8
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TASKLET: 196835 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
SCHED: 161852 146745 129539 126064 127998 128014 120243 117391
HRTIMER: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCU: 337707 289397 251874 239796 254377 254898 267497 256624
```
As we can see the `softirq_vec` array has `softirq_action` types. This is main data structure related to the `softirq` mechanism, so all `softirqs` represented by the `softirq_action` structure. The `softirq_action` structure consists only of one the field: an action pointer to the softirq function:
```C
struct softirq_action
{
void (*action)(struct softirq_action *);
};
```
So, after this we can understand thatthe `open_softirq` function fills the `softirq_vec` array with the given `softirq_action`. The registered deferred interrupt (with the call of the `open_softirq` function) for it to be queued for execution, it should be activated by the call of the `raise_softirq` function. This function takes only one parameter - softirq index `nr`. Let's look on its implementation:
```C
void raise_softirq(unsigned int nr)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
```
Here we can see the call of the `raise_softirq_irqoff` function between the `local_irq_save` and the `local_irq_restore` macros. The `local_irq_save` defined in the [include/linux/irqflags.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/irqflags.h) header file and saves the state of the [IF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt_flag) flag of the [eflags](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAGS_register) register and disables interrupts on the local processor. The `local_irq_restore` macro defined in the same header file and does the opposite thing: restores the `interrupt flag` and enables interrupts. We disable interrupts here because a `softirq` interrupt runs in interrupt context and that one softirq (and no others) will be run.
The `raise_softirq_irqoff` function marks the softirq as deffered by setting the bit corresponding to the given index `nr` in the `softirq` bit mask (`__softirq_pending`) of the local processor. It does it with the help of the:
```C
__raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
```
macro. After this, it checks the result of the `in_interrupt` that returns `irq_count` value. We already saw the `irq_count` in the first [part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/interrupts/interrupts-1.html) of this chapter and it is used to check if a CPU is already on an interrupt stack or not. We just exit from the `raise_softirq_irqoff`, restore `IF` flang and enable interrupts on the local processor If we are in interrupt context. In another way we call the `wakeup_softirqd`:
```C
if (!in_interrupt())
wakeup_softirqd();
```
Where the `wakeup_softirqd` function activates the `ksoftirqd` kernel thread of the local processor:
```C
static void wakeup_softirqd(void)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = __this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd);
if (tsk && tsk->state != TASK_RUNNING)
wake_up_process(tsk);
}
```
Each `ksoftirqd` kernel thread runs the `run_ksoftirqd` function that checks existence of deferred interrupts and calls the `__do_softirq` function depends on result. This function reads the `__softirq_pending` softirq bit mask of the local processor and executes the deferrable functions corresponding to every set bit. During executing a deferred function, new pending `softirqs` might occur. The main problem here that execution of the userspace code can be delayed for a long time while the `__do_softirq` function will handle deferred interrupts. For this purpose, it has the limit of the time when it must be finsihed:
```C
unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
...
...
...
restart:
while ((softirq_bit = ffs(pending))) {
...
h->action(h);
...
}
...
...
...
pending = local_softirq_pending();
if (pending) {
if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched() &&
--max_restart)
goto restart;
}
...
```
Checks of the existence of the deferred interrupts performed periodically and there are some points where this check occurs. The main point where this situation occurs is the call of the `do_IRQ` function that defined in the [arch/x86/kernel/irq.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c) and provides main possibilities for actual interrupt processing in the Linux kernel. When this function will finish to handle an interrupt, it calls the `exiting_irq` function from the [arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h) that expands to the call of the `irq_exit` function. The `irq_exit` checks deferred interrupts, current context and calls the `invoke_softirq` function:
```C
if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
invoke_softirq();
```
that executes the `__do_softirq` too. So what do we have in summary. Each `softirq` goes through the following stages: Registration of a `softirq` with the `open_softirq` function. Activation of a `softirq` by marking it as deferred with the `raise_softirq` function. After this, all marked `softirqs` will be runned in the next time the Linux kernel schedules a round of executions of deferrable functions. And execution of the deferred functions that have the same type.
As I already wrote, the `softirqs` are statically allocated and it is a problem for a kernel module that can be loaded. The second concept that built on top of `softirq` - the `tasklets` solves this problem.
Tasklets
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you will read source code of the Linux kernel that is related to the `softirq`, you will note that it is very rarely used there. The preferable way to implement deferrable functions are `tasklets`. As I already wrote above the `tasklets` are built on top of the `softirq` concept and generally on top of two `softirqs`:
* `TASKLET_SOFTIRQ`;
* `HI_SOFTIRQ`.
In sort words, `tasklets` are `softirqs` that can be allocated and initialized at runtime and unlike `softirqs`, tasklets that have the same type cannot be runned on a sereral processors in one time. Ok, now we know a little bit about the `softirqs`, of course previous text does not cover all aspects about this, but now we can directly look on the code and to know more about the `softirqs` step by step on practice and to know about `tasklets`. Let's back to the implementation of the `softirq_init` function that we talked about in the beginning of this part. This function defined in the [kernel/softirq.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/softirq.c) source code file, let's look on its implementation:
```C
void __init softirq_init(void)
{
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
per_cpu(tasklet_vec, cpu).tail =
&per_cpu(tasklet_vec, cpu).head;
per_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec, cpu).tail =
&per_cpu(tasklet_hi_vec, cpu).head;
}
open_softirq(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_action);
open_softirq(HI_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_hi_action);
}
```
We can see defineition of the integer `cpu` variable at the beginning of the `softirq_init` function. Next we will use it as parameter for the `for_each_possible_cpu` macro that goes through the all possible processors in the system. If the `possible processor` is the new terminology for you, you can know more about it the [CPU masks](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Concepts/cpumask.html) chapter. In short words, `possible cpus` is the set of processors that can be plugged in anytime during the life of that system boot. All `possible processors` stored in the `cpu_possible_bits` bitmap, you can find its definition in the [kernel/cpu.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/cpu.c):
```C
static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_possible_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
...
...
...
const struct cpumask *const cpu_possible_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_possible_bits);
```
Ok, we defined the integer `cpu` variable and go through the all possible processors with the `for_each_possible_cpu` macro and makes initialization of the two following [per-cpu](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Concepts/per-cpu.html) variables:
* `tasklet_vec`;
* `tasklet_hi_vec`;
These two `per-cpu` variables defined in the same source [code](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/softirq.c) file as the `softirq_init` function and represent two `tasklet_head` structures:
```C
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_head, tasklet_vec);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_head, tasklet_hi_vec);
```
Where `tasklet_head` structure represent list of `Tasklets` and contains two fields, head and tail:
```C
struct tasklet_head {
struct tasklet_struct *head;
struct tasklet_struct **tail;
};
```
The `tasklet_struct` structure defined in the [include/linux/interrupt.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/interrupt.h) and represents the `Tasklet`. Previously we did not see this word in this book. Let's try to understand what is it `tasklet`. In short words, the tasklet is a thread that has no context and stack. Actually, the tasklet is an one of mechanisms to handle deferred interrupt. Let's look on the implementation if the `tasklet_struct` structure:
```C
struct tasklet_struct
{
struct tasklet_struct *next;
unsigned long state;
atomic_t count;
void (*func)(unsigned long);
unsigned long data;
};
```
As we can see this structure contains five fields, they are:
* Next tasklet in the scheduling queue;
* State of the tasklet;
* Represent current state of the tasklet, active or not;
* Main callback of the tasklet;
* Parameter of the callback.
In our case, we set only for initialize only two arrays of tasklets in the `softirq_init` function: the `tasklet_vec` and the `tasklet_hi_vec`. Tasklets and high-priority tasklets are stored in the `tasklet_vec` and `tasklet_hi_vec` arrays, respectively. So, we have initialized these arrays and now we can see two calls of the `open_softirq` function that defined in the [kernel/softirq.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/softirq.c) source code file:
```C
open_softirq(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_action);
open_softirq(HI_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_hi_action);
```
in the end of the `softirq_init` function. The main purpose of the `open_softirq` function is initalization of `softirq`. Let's look on the implementation of the `open_softirq` function.
, in our case they are: `tasklet_action` and the `tasklet_hi_action` or the `softirq` function associated with the `HI_SOFTIRQ` softirq is named `tasklet_hi_action` and `softirq` function associated with the `TASKLET_SOFTIRQ` is named `tasklet_action`. The Linux kernel provides API for the manipulating of `tasklets`. First of all it is the `tasklet_init` function that takes `tasklet_struct`, function and parameter for it and initializes the given `tasklet_struct` with the given data:
```C
void tasklet_init(struct tasklet_struct *t,
void (*func)(unsigned long), unsigned long data)
{
t->next = NULL;
t->state = 0;
atomic_set(&t->count, 0);
t->func = func;
t->data = data;
}
```
There are additional methods to initialize a tasklet statically with the two following macros:
```C
DECLARE_TASKLET(name, func, data);
DECLARE_TASKLET_DISABLED(name, func, data);
```
The Linux kernel provides three following functions to mark a tasklet as ready to run:
```C
void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t);
void tasklet_hi_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t);
void tasklet_hi_schedule_first(struct tasklet_struct *t);
```
The first function schedules a tasklet with the normal priory, the second with the high priority and the third out of turn. Implementation of the all of these three functions is similar, so we will consider only the first - `tasklet_schedule`. Let's look on its implementation:
```C
static inline void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
if (!test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
__tasklet_schedule(t);
}
void __tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
t->next = NULL;
*__this_cpu_read(tasklet_vec.tail) = t;
__this_cpu_write(tasklet_vec.tail, &(t->next));
raise_softirq_irqoff(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
```
As we can see it checks and set the state of the given tasklet to the `TASKLET_STATE_SCHED` and executes the `__tasklet_schedule` with the given tasklet. The `__tasklet_schedule` looks very similar on the `raise_softirq` function that we saw above. It saves the `interrupt flag` and disables interrupts at the beginning. After this it updates `tasklet_vec` with the new tasklet and calls the `raise_softirq_irqoff` function that we saw above. When the Linux kernel scheduler will decide to run deferred functions, the `tasklet_action` function will be called for deferred functions which are associated with the `TASKLET_SOFTIRQ` and `tasklet_hi_action` for deferred functions which are associated with the `HI_SOFTIRQ`. These functions are very similar and there is only one difference between they is that the `tasklet_action` uses `tasklet_vec`, but the `tasklet_hi_action` uses `tasklet_hi_vec`.
Let's look on the implementation of the `tasklet_action` function:
```C
static void tasklet_action(struct softirq_action *a)
{
local_irq_disable();
list = __this_cpu_read(tasklet_vec.head);
__this_cpu_write(tasklet_vec.head, NULL);
__this_cpu_write(tasklet_vec.tail, this_cpu_ptr(&tasklet_vec.head));
local_irq_enable();
while (list) {
if (tasklet_trylock(t)) {
t->func(t->data);
tasklet_unlock(t);
}
...
...
...
}
}
```
In the beginning of the `tasketl_action` function we disable interrupts for the local processor with the help of the `local_irq_disable` macro (you can read about this macro in the second [part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/interrupts/interrupts-2.html) of this chapter). In the next step we take a head of the list that contains tasklets with normal priority and set this percpu list to `NULL` because all tasklets must be executed in a generaly way. After this we enable interrupts for the local processor and go through the list of taklets in the loop. In the every iteration of the loop we call the `tasklet_trylock` function for the given tasklet that update state of the given tasklet on `TASKLET_STATE_RUN`:
```C
static inline int tasklet_trylock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
return !test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
}
```
If this operation was successful we execute tasklet's action (it was set in the `tasklet_init`) and call the `tasklet_unlock` function that clears tasklet's `TASKLET_STATE_RUN` state.
In generall that's all about `tasklets` concept. Of course this does not cover full `tasklets`, but I think that it is good point from where you can continue to learn this concept.
The `tasklets` are [widely](http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=tasklet_init) used concept in the Linux kernel, but as I wrote in the beginning of this part there is third mechanism for deferred functions - `workqueue`. In the next paragraph we will know what is it.
Workqueues
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The `workqueue` is another concept for handling deferred functions. It is similar on `tasklets`, but has some differences. Workqueue functions run in the context of a kernel process, but `tasklet` functions run in software interrupt context. This means that `workqueue` functions must not be atomic as `tasklet` functions. Tasklets always run on the processor from which they were originally submitted. Workqueues work in the same way, but only by default. The `workqueue` concept represented by the:
```C
struct worker_pool {
spinlock_t lock;
int cpu;
int node;
int id;
unsigned int flags;
struct list_head worklist;
int nr_workers;
...
...
...
```
structure that defined in the [kernel/workqueue.c](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/kernel/workqueue.c) source code file in the Linux kernel. I will not write the source code of this structure here, because it has quite a bit of fileds, but we will consider some of their feilds.
In its most basic form, the work queue subsystem is an interface for creating kernel threads to handle work that is queued from elsewhere. All of these kernel threads are called - `worker threads`. The work queue are maintained by the `work_struct` that defined in the [include/linux/workqueue.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/workqueue.h). Let's look on this structure:
```C
struct work_struct {
atomic_long_t data;
struct list_head entry;
work_func_t func;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
struct lockdep_map lockdep_map;
#endif
};
```
Here are two things that we are interested: `func` - the function that will be scheduled by the `workqueue` and the `data` - parameter of this function. The Linux kernel provides special per-cpu threads that are called - `kworker`:
```
systemd-cgls -k | grep kworker
├─ 5 [kworker/0:0H]
├─ 15 [kworker/1:0H]
├─ 20 [kworker/2:0H]
├─ 25 [kworker/3:0H]
├─ 30 [kworker/4:0H]
...
...
...
```
This process can be used to schedule the deferred functions of the workqueues (as `ksoftirqd` for `softirqs`). Besides this we can create new separate worker thread for a `workqueue`. The Linux kernel provides following macros for the creation of workqueue:
```C
#define DECLARE_WORK(n, f) \
struct work_struct n = __WORK_INITIALIZER(n, f)
```
for static creation. It takes two parameters: name of the workqueue and the workqueue function. For creation of workqueue in runtime, we can use the:
```C
#define INIT_WORK(_work, _func) \
__INIT_WORK((_work), (_func), 0)
#define __INIT_WORK(_work, _func, _onstack) \
do { \
__init_work((_work), _onstack); \
(_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
(_work)->func = (_func); \
} while (0)
```
macro that takes `work_struct` structure that has to be created and the function to be scheduled in this workqueue. After a `work` was created with the one of these macros, we need to put it to the `workqueue`. We can do it with the help of the `queue_work` or the `queue_delayed_work` functions:
```C
static inline bool queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
return queue_work_on(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, wq, work);
}
```
The `queue_work` function just calls the `queue_work_on` function that queue work on specific processor. Note that in our case we pass the `WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT` to the `queue_work_on` function. It is a part of the `enum` that defined in the [include/linux/workqueue.h](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/workqueue.h) and represents workqueue which are not bound to any specific processor. The `queue_work_on` function tests and set the `WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT` bit of the given `work` and executes the `__queue_work` function with the `workqueue` for the given processor and given `work`:
```C
__queue_work(cpu, wq, work);
```
The `__queue_work` function gets the `work pool`. Yes not `workqueue`, but `work pool`. Actually all `works` are placed not in the `workqueue`, but to the `work pool` that represented by the `worker_pool` structure in the Linux kernel. As you can see above, the `workqueue_struct` structure has the `pwqs` field which is list of `worker_pools`. When we create a `workqueue`, it stands out for each processor the `pool_workqueue`. Each `pool_workqueue` associated with `worker_pool`, which is allocated on the same processor and corresponds to the type of priority queue. Through them `workqueue` interacts with `worker_pool`. So in the `__queue_work` function we set the cpu to the current processor with the `raw_smp_processor_id` (you can find information about this marco in the fouth [part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Initialization/linux-initialization-4.html) of the Linux kernel initialization process chapter), geting the `pool_workqueue` for the given `workqueue_struct` and insert the given `work` to the given `workqueue`:
```C
static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
...
...
...
if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
else
pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
...
...
...
insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
```
As we can create `works` and `workqueue`, we need to know when they are execute. As I already wrote, all `works` executed by the kernel thread. When this kernel thread scheduled, it starts to execute `works` from the given `workqueue`. Each worker thread executes a loop inside the `worker_thread` function. This thread makes many different things and part of these things are similar to that we saw before in this part. As it started to work, it removes all `work_struct` or `works` from its `workqueue`.
That's all.
Conclusion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the end of the ninth part of the [Interrupts and Interrupt Handling](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/interrupts/index.html) chapter and we continued to dive into external hardware interrupts in this part. In the previous part we saw initialization of the `IRQs` and main `irq_desc` structure. In this part we saw three concepts: the `softirq`, `tasklet` and `workqueue` that are used for the deferred functions.
The next part will be last part of the `Interrupts and Interrupt Handling` chapter and we will look on the real hardware driver and will try to learn how it works with the interrupts subsystem.
If you will have any questions or suggestions write me a comment or ping me at [twitter](https://twitter.com/0xAX).
**Please note that English is not my first language, And I am really sorry for any inconvenience. If you will find any mistakes please send me PR to [linux-internals](https://github.com/0xAX/linux-internals).**
Links
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* [initcall](http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/kernelnewbies/documents/initcall/index.html)
* [IF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt_flag)
* [eflags](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAGS_register)
* [CPU masks](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Concepts/cpumask.html)
* [per-cpu](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Concepts/per-cpu.html)
* [Workqueue](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/workqueue.txt)
* [Previous part](http://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/interrupts/interrupts-8.html)
Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save