This is the sixth part of the chapter which describes [synchronization primitives](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_(computer_science) in the Linux kernel and in the previous parts we finished to consider different [readers-writer lock](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers%E2%80%93writer_lock) synchronization primitives. We will continue to learn synchronization primitives in this part and start to consider a similar synchronization primitive which can be used to avoid the `writer starvation` problem. The name of this synchronization primitive is - `seqlock` or `sequential locks`.
This is the sixth part of the chapter which describes [synchronization primitives](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_(computer_science)) in the Linux kernel and in the previous parts we finished to consider different [readers-writer lock](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers%E2%80%93writer_lock) synchronization primitives. We will continue to learn synchronization primitives in this part and start to consider a similar synchronization primitive which can be used to avoid the `writer starvation` problem. The name of this synchronization primitive is - `seqlock` or `sequential locks`.
We know from the previous [part](https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/SyncPrim/sync-5.html) that [readers-writer lock](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers%E2%80%93writer_lock) is a special lock mechanism which allows concurrent access for read-only operations, but an exclusive lock is needed for writing or modifying data. As we may guess it may lead to problem which is called `writer starvation`. In other words, a writer process can't acquire a lock as long as at least one reader process which aqcuired a lock holds it. So, in the situation when contention is high, it will lead to situation when a writer process which wants to acquire a lock will wait for it for a long time.
Tim
8 years ago