From af5829bf84296f7b8d75eacac379f631c30ce162 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Yilong <liyilongko@163.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:21:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix typo: &lock-val to &lock->val

---
 SyncPrim/linux-sync-2.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/SyncPrim/linux-sync-2.md b/SyncPrim/linux-sync-2.md
index 9e7c544..f102bfc 100644
--- a/SyncPrim/linux-sync-2.md
+++ b/SyncPrim/linux-sync-2.md
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ which compares the `old` with the value pointed to by `ptr`.  If they differ, it
 Let's back to the `queued_spin_lock` function. Assuming that we are the first one who tried to acquire the lock, the `val` will be zero and we will return from the `queued_spin_lock` function:
 
 ```C
-	val = atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock-val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
+	val = atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
 	if (likely(val == 0))
 		return;
 ```
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
 	...
 	if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
 		int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
-		val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock-val,
+		val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->val,
 					       (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--);
 	}
 	...