1
0
mirror of https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat.git synced 2024-10-12 02:48:58 +00:00
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jsteube
c512e0c01a Add example -L kernel for algorithms with appended salt in utf16le 2017-07-13 00:16:29 +02:00
jsteube
9b6c6df53d Add xxx_nit_vector_from_scalar() to all inc_hash_xxx.cl includes 2017-07-12 15:45:22 +02:00
jsteube
8a6e3a5275 Add support in HMAC for passwords larger than block size of the underlaying hash 2017-07-10 11:15:15 +02:00
jsteube
f619811b70 Remove PBKDF2-HMAC-MD5 includes password length limit 2017-07-09 23:53:53 +02:00
philsmd
03f4e2b3dc minor typo fixed in comment for the new update() functions 2017-07-05 12:16:37 +02:00
Jens Steube
56dc8ae359 Add two functions md5_update_global_utf16le_swap() and md5_update_global_swap() for later use 2017-07-01 15:06:17 +02:00
jsteube
165380c454 Simplify WPA/WPA2 cracking kernel 2017-07-01 14:41:53 +02:00
jsteube
120cf1d1ba Removed some unused functions, added -m 500 kernel with length 256 support but not activated because too slow 2017-06-23 09:24:50 +02:00
jsteube
71d4926afa Converted -m 400 to password length 256 support
Something weird happend here, read on!

I've expected some performance drop because this algorithm is using the password data itself inside the iteration loop.
That is different to PBKDF2, which I've converted in mode 2100 before and which did not show any performance as expected.

So after I've finished converting this kernel and testing everything works using the unit test, I did some benchmarks to see how much the
performance drop is.

On my 750ti, the speed dropped (minimal) from 981kH/s -> 948kH/s, that's mostly because of the SIMD support i had to drop.
If I'd turn off the SIMD support in the original, the drop would be even less, that us 967kH/s -> 948kH/s which is a bit of a more reasable
comparison in case we just want to rate the drop that is actually caused by the code change itself.

The drop was acceptable for me, so I've decided to check on my GTX1080.Now the weird thing: The performance increased from 6619kH/s to
7134kH/s!!

When I gave it a second thought, it turned out that:

1. The GTX1080 is a scalar GPU so it wont suffer from the drop of the SIMD code as the 750ti did
2. There's a change in how the global data (password) is read into the registers, it reads only that amount of data it actually needs by using
the pw_len information
3. I've added a barrier for CLK_GLOBAL_MEM_FENCE as it turned out to increase the performance in the 750ti

Note that this kernel is now branched into password length < 40 and larger.

There's a large drop on performance where SIMD is really important, for example CPU.

We could workaround this issue by sticking to SIMD inside the length < 40 branch, but I don't know yet how this can be done efficiently.
2017-06-22 13:49:15 +02:00