This change makes clicking on journal items in the list to show in a
separate activity. At the moment it just makes for a slightly nicer
presentation. In the future we would change it to show the data in a
nice formatted way instead of a raw dump of the vObject.
There was an issue that for the first load it would only check the url
after a redirect (if there is one), which meant that for example,
the dashboard, would open in app because you'd be redirected to the
login page.
Account migration works in most cases, though while testing I managed to
get it to fail in some rare occasions. This commit adds a check to
verify the number of contacts we thought we migrated is equal to the
number of contacts we have after migration.
If the check fails, it presents the user with a notification that opens
the relevant FAQ entry on the EteSync website.
This doesn't work well, but I'm keeping it since it's still better than
what was there before.
We have a problem that on initial sync with long enough logs, Android
kills the sync manager before completion. The reason for that is that
due to the fact that EteSync first downloads the whole journal and only then
processes it, the sync manager spends a minute without making any
network traffic, which in turn makes Android kill the sync[1].
This should probably be fixed by paginating the initial download, that
is, downloading and processing the journal in chunks, which is possibly
a good idea regardless.
1: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/AbstractThreadedSyncAdapter.html
It seems like there's an issue with Android that sometimes the userData
passed to addAccountExplicitly is not correctly set in the Android cache
making it return null on subsequent fetches. It doesn't always happen
because some cases clear the cache, however I can consistently trigger
it by creating and deleting an account a few times in a row.
This is an ugly workaround. For some reason a sync is called when an
account is removed. Since the main account is removed, we get an invalid
account exception when trying to fetch it.
Need to find out why a sync is even triggered and just remove it there.
Android allows only having one address book per account, so until now
users of EteSync were only able to have one address book. This was
always an annoying limitation, but even more so now that journal sharing
is implemented.
Luckily, DAVdroid recently implemented multiple account support by
creating sub-accounts for address books.
This patch is an import of the DAVdroid changes, with adjustments to
work with EteSync, and a few changes that did not make sense for
EteSync. The original commits' split didn't provide any value over this
squash, and the amount of adjustments and addition needed to be done to
apply them, made me decide to squash this change together.
This commit is mostly based on:
dfec72ce6b8ff5e0780e9ac4418c81d080f4b60b
9817594da14ad8dffae18de386e14aeaf41312b9
Thanks to @dschuermann for the suggestion. This makes it easier for
people of non-latin speaking cultures to compare the fingerprints.
Code is based off of Signal's fingerprint generation.
This change only works for calendars at the moment, because we don't have shared
address books anyway.
This is currently only implemented in the client, and only as a read-only attribute,
you can't make a journal read-only yet. This requires server support that is not yet
there, but it's better to be ready for this sooner rather than later.
Some of the information is now saved there, and more will be transferred
soon. CollectionInfo includes the encrypted part, and journalentity the
non-encrypted part of the journal info, so both are needed.
The reason for that is that before version 2, all the journals of a
particular user shared the same encryption key, which means, sharing a
journal of version one, would essentially give away the encryption key
of all of its journals, even the private ones.
This is thus blocked for security reasons.
This currently just adds the journal back, but doesn't re-apply the
journal, so the calendar for example would be empty, but the journal
itself would be listed and visible.
