I was trying to avoid it, and keep it as davdroid both for attribution,
and making it easy to cherry-pick fixes from DAVdroid.
However, it seems to be causing clashes with the davdroid app, although
every piece of documentation claims otherwise.[1]
At least it seems like cherry-picks can still be achieved using:
git cherry-pick -s recursive -X find-renames=30 COMMIT
1. https://developer.android.com/studio/build/application-id.html
(one such doc)
This commit includes the major changes between DAVdroid and EteSync. It
adjusts the app to use the EteSync protocol and server. It includes some
ugliness still, and it's a squash of many ugly snapshot commits while
hacking on the initial DAVdroid code.
History should be "clean" from this point onwards.
* HttpClient: authentication that is limited to a host name is never preemptive
* DavResourceFinder: service configuration == null means that this service is not available
* new SQLite database for CalDAV/CardDAV services
* added AccountDetailsFragment, which asks for account name and then finishes account creation
* updated AccountListFragment
