1
0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook synced 2024-11-29 11:28:20 +00:00
bitcoinbook/ch09.asciidoc
David A. Harding a904ea4db9 CH11: described signets
- Describe the problem with testnet3
- BIP325 signet as a solution
- Using signet(s)
2023-05-19 13:22:57 -10:00

810 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

[[blockchain]]
== The Blockchain
=== Introduction
((("blockchain (the)", "overview of")))The blockchain data structure is
an ordered, back-linked list of blocks of transactions. The blockchain
can be stored as a flat file, or in a simple database. The Bitcoin Core
client stores the blockchain metadata using Google's LevelDB database.
Blocks are linked "back," each referring to the previous block in the
chain. ((("blocks", "block height")))The blockchain is often visualized
as a vertical stack, with blocks layered on top of each other and the
first block serving as the foundation of the stack. The visualization of
blocks stacked on top of each other results in the use of terms such as
"height" to refer to the distance from the first block, and "top" or
"tip" to refer to the most recently added block.
((("blocks", "block hash")))((("blocks", "genesis block")))((("blocks",
"parent blocks")))((("genesis block")))((("parent blocks")))Each block
within the blockchain is identified by a hash, generated using the
SHA256 cryptographic hash algorithm on the header of the block. Each
block also references a previous block, known as the _parent_ block,
through the "previous block hash" field in the block header. In other
words, each block contains the hash of its parent inside its own header.
The sequence of hashes linking each block to its parent creates a chain
going back all the way to the first block ever created, known as the
_genesis block_.
Although a block has just one parent, it can temporarily have multiple
children. Each of the children refers to the same block as its parent
and contains the same (parent) hash in the "previous block hash" field.
Multiple children arise during a blockchain "fork," a temporary
situation that occurs when different blocks are discovered almost
simultaneously by different miners (see <<forks>>). Eventually, only one
child block becomes part of the blockchain and the "fork" is resolved.
Even though a block may have more than one child, each block can have
only one parent. This is because a block has one single "previous block
hash" field referencing its single parent.
The "previous block hash" field is inside the block header and thereby
affects the _current_ block's hash. The child's own identity changes if
the parent's identity changes. When the parent is modified in any way,
the parent's hash changes. The parent's changed hash necessitates a
change in the "previous block hash" pointer of the child. This in turn
causes the child's hash to change, which requires a change in the
pointer of the grandchild, which in turn changes the grandchild, and so
on. This cascade effect ensures that once a block has many generations
following it, it cannot be changed without forcing a recalculation of
all subsequent blocks. Because such a recalculation would require
enormous computation (and therefore energy consumption), the existence
of a long chain of blocks makes the blockchain's deep history immutable,
which is a key feature of bitcoin's security.
One way to think about the blockchain is like layers in a geological
formation, or glacier core sample. The surface layers might change with
the seasons, or even be blown away before they have time to settle. But
once you go a few inches deep, geological layers become more and more
stable. By the time you look a few hundred feet down, you are looking at
a snapshot of the past that has remained undisturbed for millions of
years. In the blockchain, the most recent few blocks might be revised if
there is a chain recalculation due to a fork. The top six blocks are
like a few inches of topsoil. But once you go more deeply into the
blockchain, beyond six blocks, blocks are less and less likely to
change. ((("transactions", "coinbase transactions")))((("coinbase
transactions")))After 100 blocks back there is so much stability that
the coinbase transaction—the transaction containing newly mined
bitcoin—can be spent. A few thousand blocks back (a month) and the
blockchain is settled history, for all practical purposes. While the
protocol always allows a chain to be undone by a longer chain and while
the possibility of any block being reversed always exists, the
probability of such an event decreases as time passes until it becomes
infinitesimal.
=== Structure of a Block
((("blocks", "structure of")))((("blockchain (the)", "block
structure")))A block is a container data structure that aggregates
transactions for inclusion in the public ledger, the blockchain. The
block is made of a header, containing metadata, followed by a long list
of transactions that make up the bulk of its size. The block header is
80 bytes, whereas the average transaction is at least 400 bytes and the
average block contains more than 1900 transactions. A complete block,
with all transactions, is therefore 10,000 times larger than the block
header. <<block_structure1>> describes the structure of a block.
[[block_structure1]]
[role="pagebreak-before"]
.The structure of a block
[options="header"]
|=======
|Size| Field | Description
| 4 bytes | Block Size | The size of the block, in bytes, following this field
| 80 bytes | Block Header | Several fields form the block header
| 1&#x2013;9 bytes (VarInt) | Transaction Counter | How many transactions follow
| Variable | Transactions | The transactions recorded in this block
|=======
[[block_header]]
=== Block Header
((("blocks", "headers")))((("blockchain (the)", "block
headers")))((("headers")))The block header consists of three sets of
block metadata. First, there is a reference to a previous block hash,
which connects this block to the previous block in the blockchain. The
second set of metadata, namely the _difficulty_, _timestamp_, and
_nonce_, relate to the mining competition, as detailed in <<mining>>.
The third piece of metadata is the merkle tree root, a data structure
used to efficiently summarize all the transactions in the block.
<<block_header_structure_ch09>> describes the structure of a block
header.
[[block_header_structure_ch09]]
.The structure of the block header
[options="header"]
|=======
|Size| Field | Description
| 4 bytes | Version | A version number to track software/protocol upgrades
| 32 bytes | Previous Block Hash | A reference to the hash of the previous (parent) block in the chain
| 32 bytes | Merkle Root | A hash of the root of the merkle tree of this block's transactions
| 4 bytes | Timestamp | The approximate creation time of this block (seconds from Unix Epoch)
| 4 bytes | Difficulty Target | The Proof-of-Work algorithm difficulty target for this block
| 4 bytes | Nonce | A counter used for the Proof-of-Work algorithm
|=======
The nonce, difficulty target, and timestamp are used in the mining
process and will be discussed in more detail in <<mining>>.
[[block_hash]]
=== Block Identifiers: Block Header Hash and Block Height
((("blockchain (the)", "block identifiers")))((("blocks", "block
height")))((("blocks", "block hash")))The primary identifier of a block
is its cryptographic hash, a digital fingerprint, made by hashing the
block header twice through the SHA256 algorithm. The resulting 32-byte
hash is called the _block hash_ but is more accurately the _block header
hash_, pass:[<span role="keep-together">because only the block header is
used to compute it. For example,</span>]
+000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f+ is
the block hash of the first bitcoin block ever created. The block hash
identifies a block uniquely and unambiguously and can be independently
derived by any node by simply hashing the block header.
Note that the block hash is not actually included inside the block's
data structure, neither when the block is transmitted on the network,
nor when it is stored on a node's persistence storage as part of the
blockchain. Instead, the block's hash is computed by each node as the
block is received from the network. The block hash might be stored in a
separate database table as part of the block's metadata, to facilitate
indexing and faster retrieval of blocks from disk.
A second way to identify a block is by its position in the blockchain,
called the pass:[<span role="keep-together"><em>block height</em>. The
first block ever created is at block height 0 (zero) and is the</span>]
pass:[<span role="keep-together">same block that was previously
referenced by the following block hash</span>]
+000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f+. A
block can thus be identified in two ways: by referencing the block hash
or by referencing the block height. Each subsequent block added "on top"
of that first block is one position "higher" in the blockchain, like
boxes stacked one on top of the other. The block height on January 1,
2017 was approximately 446,000, meaning there were 446,000 blocks
stacked on top of the first block created in January 2009.
Unlike the block hash, the block height is not a unique identifier.
Although a single block will always have a specific and invariant block
height, the reverse is not true—the block height does not always
identify a single block. Two or more blocks might have the same block
height, competing for the same position in the blockchain. This scenario
is discussed in detail in the section <<forks>>. In early blocks, the block height was
also not a part of the block's data structure; it was not stored within
the block. Each node dynamically identified a block's position (height)
in the blockchain when it was received from the Bitcoin network. A
later protocol change (BIP34) began including the block height in the
coinbase transaction, although it's purpose was to ensure each block had
a different coinbase transaction. Nodes still need to dynamically
identify a block's height in order to validate the coinbase field. The
block height might also be stored as metadata in an indexed database
table for faster retrieval.
[TIP]
====
A block's _block hash_ always identifies a single block uniquely. A
block also always has a specific _block height_. However, it is not
always the case that a specific block height can identify a single
block. Rather, two or more blocks might compete for a single position in
the blockchain.
====
=== The Genesis Block
((("blocks", "genesis block")))((("blockchain (the)", "genesis
block")))The first block in the blockchain is called the genesis block
and was created in 2009. It is the common ancestor of all the blocks in
the blockchain, meaning that if you start at any block and follow the
chain backward in time, you will eventually arrive at the genesis block.
Every node always starts with a blockchain of at least one block because
the genesis block is statically encoded within the Bitcoin client
software, such that it cannot be altered. Every node always "knows" the
genesis block's hash and structure, the fixed time it was created, and
even the single transaction within. Thus, every node has the starting
point for the blockchain, a secure "root" from which to build a trusted
blockchain.
See the statically encoded genesis block inside the Bitcoin Core client,
in http://bit.ly/1x6rcwP[_chainparams.cpp_].
The following identifier hash belongs to the genesis block:
----
000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
----
You can search for that block hash in any block explorer website, such
as _blockchain.info_, and you will find a page describing the contents
of this block, with a URL containing that hash:
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
Using the Bitcoin Core reference client on the command line:
----
$ bitcoin-cli getblock 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
----
[source,json]
----
{
"hash" : "000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f",
"confirmations" : 308321,
"size" : 285,
"height" : 0,
"version" : 1,
"merkleroot" : "4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b",
"tx" : [
"4a5e1e4baab89f3a32518a88c31bc87f618f76673e2cc77ab2127b7afdeda33b"
],
"time" : 1231006505,
"nonce" : 2083236893,
"bits" : "1d00ffff",
"difficulty" : 1.00000000,
"nextblockhash" : "00000000839a8e6886ab5951d76f411475428afc90947ee320161bbf18eb6048"
}
----
The genesis block contains a hidden message within it. The coinbase
transaction input contains the text "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on
brink of second bailout for banks." This message was intended to offer
proof of the earliest date this block was created, by referencing the
headline of the British newspaper _The Times_. It also serves as a
tongue-in-cheek reminder of the importance of an independent monetary
system, with bitcoin's launch occurring at the same time as an
unprecedented worldwide monetary crisis. The message was embedded in the
first block by Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin's creator.
=== Linking Blocks in the Blockchain
((("blocks", "linking blocks in the blockchain")))((("blockchain (the)",
"linking blocks in the blockchain")))Bitcoin full nodes maintain a local
copy of the blockchain, starting at the genesis block. The local copy of
the blockchain is constantly updated as new blocks are found and used to
extend the chain. As a node receives incoming blocks from the network,
it will validate these blocks and then link them to the existing
blockchain. To establish a link, a node will examine the incoming block
header and look for the "previous block hash."
Let's assume, for example, that a node has 277,314 blocks in the local
copy of the blockchain. The last block the node knows about is block
277,314, with a block header hash of:
----
00000000000000027e7ba6fe7bad39faf3b5a83daed765f05f7d1b71a1632249
----
The Bitcoin node then receives a new block from the network, which it
parses as follows:
[source,json]
----
{
"size" : 43560,
"version" : 2,
"previousblockhash" :
"00000000000000027e7ba6fe7bad39faf3b5a83daed765f05f7d1b71a1632249",
"merkleroot" :
"5e049f4030e0ab2debb92378f53c0a6e09548aea083f3ab25e1d94ea1155e29d",
"time" : 1388185038,
"difficulty" : 1180923195.25802612,
"nonce" : 4215469401,
"tx" : [
"257e7497fb8bc68421eb2c7b699dbab234831600e7352f0d9e6522c7cf3f6c77",
#[... many more transactions omitted ...]
"05cfd38f6ae6aa83674cc99e4d75a1458c165b7ab84725eda41d018a09176634"
]
}
----
Looking at this new block, the node finds the +previousblockhash+ field,
which contains the hash of its parent block. It is a hash known to the
node, that of the last block on the chain at height 277,314. Therefore,
this new block is a child of the last block on the chain and extends the
existing blockchain. The node adds this new block to the end of the
chain, making the blockchain longer with a new height of 277,315.
<<chain_of_blocks>> shows the chain of three blocks, linked by
references in the +previousblockhash+ field.
[[merkle_trees]]
=== Merkle Trees
((("merkle trees", id="merkle09")))((("blockchain (the)", "merkle
trees", id="BCTmerkle09")))Each block in the Bitcoin blockchain contains
a summary of all the transactions in the block using a _merkle tree_.
((("binary hash trees", see="merkle trees")))A _merkle tree_, also known
as a _binary hash tree_, is a data structure used for efficiently
summarizing and verifying the integrity of large sets of data. Merkle
trees are binary trees containing cryptographic hashes. The term "tree"
is used in computer science to describe a branching data structure, but
these trees are usually displayed upside down with the "root" at the top
and the "leaves" at the bottom of a diagram, as you will see in the
examples that follow.
[[chain_of_blocks]]
[role="smallerfourtyfive"]
.Blocks linked in a chain by reference to the previous block header hash
image::images/mbc2_0901.png[]
Merkle trees are used in bitcoin to summarize all the transactions in a
block, producing an overall digital fingerprint of the entire set of
transactions, providing a very efficient process to verify whether a
transaction is included in a block. A merkle tree is constructed by
recursively hashing pairs of nodes until there is only one hash, called
the _root_, or _merkle root_. The cryptographic hash algorithm used in
bitcoin's merkle trees is SHA256 applied twice, also known as
double-SHA256.
When N data elements are hashed and summarized in a merkle tree, you can
check to see if any one data element is included in the tree with at
most +2*log~2~(N)+ calculations, making this a very efficient data
structure.
The merkle tree is constructed bottom-up. In the following example, we
start with four transactions, A, B, C, and D, which form the _leaves_ of
the merkle tree, as shown in <<simple_merkle>>. The transactions are not
stored in the merkle tree; rather, their data is hashed and the
resulting hash is stored in each leaf node as H~A~, H~B~, H~C~, and
H~D~:
++++
<pre data-type="codelisting">
H<sub>A</sub> = SHA256(SHA256(Transaction A))
</pre>
++++
Consecutive pairs of leaf nodes are then summarized in a parent node, by
concatenating the two hashes and hashing them together. For example, to
construct the parent node H~AB~, the two 32-byte hashes of the children
are concatenated to create a 64-byte string. That string is then
double-hashed to produce the parent node's hash:
++++
<pre data-type="codelisting">
H<sub>AB</sub> = SHA256(SHA256(H<sub>A</sub> + H<sub>B</sub>))
</pre>
++++
The process continues until there is only one node at the top, the node
known as the merkle root. That 32-byte hash is stored in the block
header and summarizes all the data in all four transactions.
<<simple_merkle>> shows how the root is calculated by pair-wise hashes
of the nodes.
[[simple_merkle]]
.Calculating the nodes in a merkle tree
image::images/mbc2_0902.png["merkle_tree"]
((("balanced trees")))Because the merkle tree is a binary tree, it needs
an even number of leaf nodes. If there is an odd number of transactions
to summarize, the last transaction hash will be duplicated to create an
even number of leaf nodes, also known as a _balanced tree_. This is
shown in <<merkle_tree_odd>>, where transaction C is duplicated.
[[merkle_tree_odd]]
.Duplicating one data element achieves an even number of data elements
image::images/mbc2_0903.png["merkle_tree_odd"]
The same method for constructing a tree from four transactions can be
generalized to construct trees of any size. In bitcoin it is common to
have several hundred to more than a thousand transactions in a single
block, which are summarized in exactly the same way, producing just 32
bytes of data as the single merkle root. In <<merkle_tree_large>>, you
will see a tree built from 16 transactions. Note that although the root
looks bigger than the leaf nodes in the diagram, it is the exact same
size, just 32 bytes. Whether there is one transaction or a hundred
thousand transactions in the block, the merkle root always summarizes
them into 32 bytes.
((("authentication paths")))To prove that a specific transaction is
included in a block, a node only needs to produce +log~2~(N)+ 32-byte
hashes, constituting an _authentication path_ or _merkle path_
connecting the specific transaction to the root of the tree. This is
especially important as the number of transactions increases, because
the base-2 logarithm of the number of transactions increases much more
slowly. This allows Bitcoin nodes to efficiently produce paths of 10 or
12 hashes (320384 bytes), which can provide proof of a single
transaction out of more than a thousand transactions in a megabyte-sized
block.
[[merkle_tree_large]]
.A merkle tree summarizing many data elements
image::images/mbc2_0904.png["merkle_tree_large"]
In <<merkle_tree_path>>, a node can prove that a transaction K is
included in the block by producing a merkle path that is only four
32-byte hashes long (128 bytes total). The path consists of the four
hashes (shown with a shaded background in <<merkle_tree_path>>) H~L~,
H~IJ~, H~MNOP~, and H~ABCDEFGH~. With those four hashes provided as an
authentication path, any node can prove that H~K~ (with a black
background at the bottom of the diagram) is included in the merkle root
by computing four additional pair-wise hashes H~KL~, H~IJKL~,
H~IJKLMNOP~, and the merkle tree root (outlined in a dashed line in the
diagram).
[[merkle_tree_path]]
.A merkle path used to prove inclusion of a data element
image::images/mbc2_0905.png["merkle_tree_path"]
The code in <<merkle_example>> demonstrates the process of creating a
merkle tree from the leaf-node hashes up to the root, using the
libbitcoin library for some helper functions.
[[merkle_example]]
[role="pagebreak-before"]
.Building a merkle tree
====
[source, cpp]
----
include::code/merkle.cpp[]
----
====
<<merkle_example_run>> shows the result of compiling and running the
merkle code.
[[merkle_example_run]]
.Compiling and running the merkle example code
====
[source,bash]
----
$ # Compile the merkle.cpp code
$ g++ -o merkle merkle.cpp $(pkg-config --cflags --libs libbitcoin)
$ # Run the merkle executable
$ ./merkle
Current merkle hash list:
32650049a0418e4380db0af81788635d8b65424d397170b8499cdc28c4d27006
30861db96905c8dc8b99398ca1cd5bd5b84ac3264a4e1b3e65afa1bcee7540c4
Current merkle hash list:
d47780c084bad3830bcdaf6eace035e4c6cbf646d103795d22104fb105014ba3
Result: d47780c084bad3830bcdaf6eace035e4c6cbf646d103795d22104fb105014ba3
----
====
The efficiency of merkle trees becomes obvious as the scale increases.
<<block_structure2>> shows the amount of data that needs to be exchanged
as a merkle path to prove that a transaction is part of a block.
[[block_structure2]]
.Merkle tree efficiency
[options="header"]
|=======
|Number of transactions| Approx. size of block | Path size (hashes) | Path size (bytes)
| 16 transactions | 4 kilobytes | 4 hashes | 128 bytes
| 512 transactions | 128 kilobytes | 9 hashes | 288 bytes
| 2048 transactions | 512 kilobytes | 11 hashes | 352 bytes
| 65,535 transactions | 16 megabytes | 16 hashes | 512 bytes
|=======
As you can see from the table, while the block size increases rapidly,
from 4 KB with 16 transactions to a block size of 16 MB to fit 65,535
transactions, the merkle path required to prove the inclusion of a
transaction increases much more slowly, from 128 bytes to only 512
bytes. With merkle trees, a node can download just the block headers (80
bytes per block) and still be able to identify a transaction's inclusion
in a block by retrieving a small merkle path from a full node, without
storing or transmitting the vast majority of the blockchain, which might
be several gigabytes in size. Clients that do not maintain a full
blockchain, called simplified payment verification (SPV) client, use
merkle paths to verify transactions without downloading full blocks.
=== Merkle Trees and Simplified Payment Verification (SPV)
((("simple-payment-verification (SPV)")))((("bitcoin nodes", "SPV
clients")))Merkle trees are used extensively by SPV clients. SPV clients don't
have all transactions and do not download full blocks, just block
headers. In order to verify that a transaction is included in a block,
without having to download all the transactions in the block, they use
an authentication path, or merkle path.
Consider, for example, an SPV client that is interested in incoming
payments to an address contained in its wallet. The SPV client will
establish a bloom filter (see <<bloom_filters>>) on its connections to
peers to limit the transactions received to only those containing
addresses of interest. When a peer sees a transaction that matches the
bloom filter, it will send that block using a +merkleblock+ message. The
+merkleblock+ message contains the block header as well as a merkle path
that links the transaction of interest to the merkle root in the block.
The SPV client can use this merkle path to connect the transaction to the
block and verify that the transaction is included in the block. The SPV
client also uses the block header to link the block to the rest of the
blockchain. The combination of these two links, between the transaction
and block, and between the block and blockchain, proves that the
transaction is recorded in the blockchain. All in all, the SPV client will
have received less than a kilobyte of data for the block header and
merkle path, an amount of data that is more than a thousand times less
than a full block (about 1 megabyte currently).((("",
startref="BCTmerkle09")))((("", startref="merkle09")))
=== Bitcoin's Test Blockchains
((("blockchain (the)", "test blockchains",
id="BCTtest09")))((("mainnet", seealso="blockchain (the)")))You might be
surprised to learn that there is more than one Bitcoin blockchain. The
"main" Bitcoin blockchain, the one created by Satoshi Nakamoto on
January 3rd, 2009, the one with the genesis block we studied in this
chapter, is called _mainnet_. There are other Bitcoin blockchains that
are used for testing purposes: at this time _testnet_, _segnet_, and
_regtest_. Let's look at each in turn.((("testnet", id="testnet09")))
==== Testnet&#x2014;Bitcoin's Testing Playground
Testnet is the name of the test blockchain, network, and currency that
is used for testing purposes. The testnet is a fully featured live P2P
network, with wallets, test bitcoins (testnet coins), mining, and all
the other features of mainnet. There are really only two differences:
testnet coins are meant to be worthless and mining difficulty should be
low enough that anyone can mine testnet coins relatively easily (keeping
them worthless).
Any software development that is intended for production use on
bitcoin's mainnet should first be tested on testnet with test coins.
This protects both the developers from monetary losses due to bugs and
the network from unintended behavior due to bugs.
Keeping the coins worthless and the mining easy, however, is not easy.
Despite pleas from developers, some people use advanced mining equipment
(GPUs and ASICs) to mine on testnet. This increases the difficulty,
makes it impossible to mine with a CPU, and eventually makes it
difficult enough to get test coins that people start valuing them, so
they're not worthless. As a result, every now and then, the testnet has
to be scrapped and restarted from a new genesis block, resetting the
difficulty.
The current testnet is called _testnet3_, the third iteration of
testnet, restarted in February 2011 to reset the difficulty from the
previous testnet.
Keep in mind that testnet3 is a large blockchain, in excess of 20 GB in
early 2017. It will take a day or so to sync fully and use up resources
on your computer. Not as much as mainnet, but not exactly "lightweight"
either. One good way to run a testnet node is as a virtual machine image
(e.g., VirtualBox, Docker, Cloud Server, etc.) dedicated for that
purpose.
===== Using testnet
Bitcoin Core, like almost all other bitcoin software, has full support
for operation on testnet instead of mainnet. All of Bitcoin Core's
functions work on testnet, including the wallet, mining testnet coins,
and syncing a full testnet node.
To start Bitcoin Core on testnet instead of mainnet you use the
+testnet+ switch:
----
$ bitcoind -testnet
----
In the logs you should see that bitcoind is building a new blockchain in
the +testnet3+ subdirectory of the default bitcoind directory:
----
bitcoind: Using data directory /home/username/.bitcoin/testnet3
----
To connect to bitcoind, you use the +bitcoin-cli+ command-line tool, but
you must also switch it to testnet mode:
----
$ bitcoin-cli -testnet getblockchaininfo
{
"chain": "test",
"blocks": 1088,
"headers": 139999,
"bestblockhash": "0000000063d29909d475a1c4ba26da64b368e56cce5d925097bf3a2084370128",
"difficulty": 1,
"mediantime": 1337966158,
"verificationprogress": 0.001644065914099759,
"chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000044104410441",
"pruned": false,
"softforks": [
[...]
----
You can also run on testnet3 with other full-node implementations, such
as +btcd+ (written in Go) and +bcoin+ (written in JavaScript), to
experiment and learn in other programming languages and frameworks.
In early 2017, testnet3 supports all the features of mainnet, including
Segregated Witness (see <<segwit>>). Therefore, testnet3 can also be
used to test Segregated Witness features.((("", startref="testnet09")))
===== Problems With Testnet
Testnet doesn't just use the same data structures as Bitcoin, it also
uses almost exactly the same Proof-of-Work (PoW) security mechanism as
Bitcoin. The notable differences for testnet are that it's minimum
difficulty is half that of Bitcoin and that it's allowed to include a
block at the minimum difficulty if that block's timestamp is more than
20 minutes after the previous block.
Unfortunately, Bitcoin's PoW security mechanism was designed to depend
on economic incentives--incentives which don't exist in a test
blockchain that is forbidden from having value. On mainnet, miners are
incentivized to include user transactions in their blocks because those
transactions pay fees. On testnet, transactions still contain something
called fees, but those fees don't have any economic value. That means
the only incentive for a testnet miner to include transactions is
because they want to help users and developers to test their software.
Alas, people who like to disrupt systems often feel a stronger
incentive, at least in the short term. Because PoW mining is designed
to be permissionless, anyone can mine, whether their intention is good
or not. That means disruptive miners can create many blocks in a row on
testnet without including any user transactions. When those attacks
happen, testnet becomes unusable for users and developers.
==== Signet: The Proof of Authority Testnet
There's no known way for a system dependent on permissionless PoW to
provide a highly usable blockchain without introducing economic
incentives, so Bitcoin protocol developers began considering
alternatives. The primary goal was to preserve as much of the structure of
Bitcoin as possible so that software could run on a testnet with minimal
changes---but to also provide an environment that would remain useful.
A secondary goal was to produce a reusable design that would allow
developers of new software to easily create their own test networks.
The solution implemented in Bitcoin Core and other software is called
_signet_, as defined by BIP325. A signet is a test network where each
block must contain proof (such as a signature) that the creation of that
block was sanctioned by a trusted authority.
Whereas mining in Bitcoin is permissionless--anyone can do it--mining on
signet is fully permissioned. Only those with permission can do it.
This would be a completely unacceptable change to Bitcoin's mainnet--no
user would accept it--but it's acceptable on a testnet where coins have
no value and the only purpose is testing software and systems.
BIP325 signets are designed to make it very easy to create your own. If
you disagree with how someone else is running their signet, you can
start your own signet and connect your software to it.
===== The Default Signet and Custom Signets
Bitcoin Core supports a default signet, which we believe to be the most
widely used signet at the time of writing. It is currently operated by
two contributors to that project. If you start Bitcoin Core with the
+-signet+ parameter and no other signet-related parameters, this is the
signet you will be using.
As of this writing, the default signet has about 150,000 blocks and is
about a gigabyte in size. It supports all of the same features as
Bitcoin's mainnet and is also used for testing proposed upgrades through
the Bitcoin Inquisition project, which is a software fork of Bitcoin
Core that's only designed to run on signet.
If you want to use a different signet, called a _custom signet_, you
will need to know the script used to determine when a block is
authorized, called the _challenge_ script. This is a standard Bitcoin
script, so it can use features such as multisig to allow multiple people
to authorize blocks. You may also need to connect to a seed node that
will provide you with the addresses of peers on the custom signet. For
example:
----
bitcoind -signet -signetchallenge=0123...cdef -signetseednode=example.com:1234
----
As of this writing, we generally recommend that the public testing of
mining software occur on testnet3 and that all other public testing of
Bitcoin software occur on the default signet.
To interact with your chosen signet, you can use the +-signet+ parameter
with +bitcoin-cli+, similar to how you used testnet. For example:
----
$ bitcoin-cli -signet getblockchaininfo
{
"chain": "signet",
"blocks": 143619,
"headers": 143619,
"bestblockhash": "000000c46cb3505ddd29653720686b6a3565ad1c5768e2908439382447572a93",
"difficulty": 0.003020638517858618,
"time": 1684530244,
"mediantime": 1684526116,
"verificationprogress": 0.999997961940662,
"initialblockdownload": false,
"chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000019ab37d2194",
"size_on_disk": 769525915,
"pruned": false,
"warnings": ""
}
----
==== Regtest&#x2014;The Local Blockchain
((("regtest (Regression Testing)")))Regtest, which stands for
"Regression Testing," is a Bitcoin Core feature that allows you to
create a local blockchain for testing purposes. Unlike testnet3, which
is a public and shared test blockchain, the regtest blockchains are
intended to be run as closed systems for local testing. You launch a
regtest blockchain from scratch, creating a local genesis block. You may
add other nodes to the network, or run it with a single node only to
test the Bitcoin Core software.
To start Bitcoin Core in regtest mode, you use the +regtest+ flag:
----
$ bitcoind -regtest
----
Just like with testnet, Bitcoin Core will initialize a new blockchain
under the _regtest_ subdirectory of your bitcoind default directory:
----
bitcoind: Using data directory /home/username/.bitcoin/regtest
----
To use the command-line tool, you need to specify the +regtest+ flag
too. Let's try the +getblockchaininfo+ command to inspect the regtest
blockchain:
----
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest getblockchaininfo
{
"chain": "regtest",
"blocks": 0,
"headers": 0,
"bestblockhash": "0f9188f13cb7b2c71f2a335e3a4fc328bf5beb436012afca590b1a11466e2206",
"difficulty": 4.656542373906925e-10,
"mediantime": 1296688602,
"verificationprogress": 1,
"chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002",
"pruned": false,
[...]
----
As you can see, there are no blocks yet. Let's mine some (500 blocks)
and earn the reward:
----
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest generate 500
[
"7afed70259f22c2bf11e406cb12ed5c0657b6e16a6477a9f8b28e2046b5ba1ca",
"1aca2f154a80a9863a9aac4c72047a6d3f385c4eec5441a4aafa6acaa1dada14",
"4334ecf6fb022f30fbd764c3ee778fabbd53b4a4d1950eae8a91f1f5158ed2d1",
"5f951d34065efeaf64e54e91d00b260294fcdfc7f05dbb5599aec84b957a7766",
"43744b5e77c1dfece9d05ab5f0e6796ebe627303163547e69e27f55d0f2b9353",
[...]
"6c31585a48d4fc2b3fd25521f4515b18aefb59d0def82bd9c2185c4ecb754327"
]
----
It will only take a few seconds to mine all these blocks, which
certainly makes it easy for testing. If you check your wallet balance,
you will see that you earned reward for the first 400 blocks (coinbase
rewards must be 100 blocks deep before you can spend them):
----
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest getbalance
12462.50000000
----
=== Using Test Blockchains for Development
((("development environment", "test blockchains and")))Bitcoin's various
blockchains (+regtest+, +segnet+, +testnet3+, +mainnet+) offer a range
of testing environments for bitcoin development. Use the test
blockchains whether you are developing for Bitcoin Core, or another
full-node consensus client; an application such as a wallet, exchange,
ecommerce site; or even developing novel smart contracts and complex
scripts.
You can use the test blockchains to establish a development pipeline.
Test your code locally on a +regtest+ as you develop it. Once you are
ready to try it on a public network, switch to +testnet+ to expose your
code to a more dynamic environment with more diversity of code and
applications. Finally, once you are confident your code works as
expected, switch to +mainnet+ to deploy it in production. As you make
changes, improvements, bug fixes, etc., start the pipeline again,
deploying each change first on +regtest+, then on +testnet+, and finally
into production.((("", startref="BCTtest09")))