9f10eb6259
Merge pull request #794 from rating89us/patch-33
...
ch11: fix multisig explanation
4 years ago
03f57404aa
Merge pull request #793 from ogennadi/patch-1
...
Fix typo
4 years ago
a6ca7173f4
Merge pull request #791 from rating89us/patch-30
...
ch02: explain that both outputs are in a single tx
4 years ago
15a43b927c
Merge pull request #789 from rating89us/patch-29
...
ch01: Alice's address -> Alice's wallet
4 years ago
388da74024
ch05: keys -> addresses
4 years ago
b640698e0f
ch04: paper wallet = private key + address
4 years ago
57dba437c5
ch11: fix multisig explanation
4 years ago
8c30f250b4
Fix typo
4 years ago
b80ffe0bfe
ch02: explain that both outputs are in a single tx
4 years ago
4956c6f6c9
ch01: Alice's address -> Alice's wallet
4 years ago
76fa766a09
ch01: wallets -> wallet
4 years ago
407fd8180b
ch09: simple -> simplified (SPV)
4 years ago
6e2568bdff
ch08: simple -> simplified (SPV)
4 years ago
c939ce53cb
ch01: simple -> simplified (SPV)
4 years ago
0261f4c086
ch02: simple -> simplified (SPV)
4 years ago
a65b9fbcd6
ch04: fix multisig explanation
4 years ago
cdcfeb16e8
Fixing typo.
4 years ago
c66298c3c5
Added missing word.
4 years ago
4ee95ea2a9
Adding missing preposition.
4 years ago
71d99e62a2
Adding missing bitcoin amounts
4 years ago
9fa9fd891e
Changing phrase to a more conventional one.
4 years ago
879243bf95
Changing phrase to a more conventional one.
4 years ago
e60b823854
Fixing off-by-one dice target, and adding more precision to the outcome.
...
The minimum target cannot be 2, because you can't throw
a pair of dice and get a value less than 2.
4 years ago
f8bd256311
Rewording phrase to be consistent with earlier phrasing
4 years ago
984005648a
Fixing typo
4 years ago
5b03ecb3df
Chapter 4: put period outside of quote marks.
4 years ago
4971598b5a
glossary: add passphrase entry
4 years ago
b56735ae9c
ch08.asciidoc I specified where UTXO pool is stored in Bitcoin Core to avoid confusion
...
When came across this paragraph I assumed, thinking "some [other than Bitcoin Core] implementations of the bitcoin client" that Bitcoin Core does not store its UTXO pool anywhere. I did [some research] (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/102267/where-in-bitcoin-are-mempool-and-utxo-pools-written ) and it turns out that it does. Providing
such a detail to the readers would help avoid unnecessary confusion.
4 years ago
e0af335152
ch08.asciidoc: Implementation status of BIP-150 and BIP-151 (
...
In fact, [BIP-151](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips ) was withdrawn.
4 years ago
eb57ec48a0
ch12: transaction -> transactions
4 years ago
5a999ae452
ch06: that -> each
4 years ago
d4fa3e590a
ch06: extracted -> extracts (parallelism)
4 years ago
dc290d7b87
"verack message" instead of "verack"
...
The reader was not introduced to the term verack earlier - 'verack' appears only once in this chapter. Thus, "verack message" seems more readable.
4 years ago
2feb6ac3c3
ch06: a -> this
4 years ago
5ecbf39068
ch06: explaining that the change "gift" goes to the miner
4 years ago
bbc3572fdc
ch04: add . to end sentence
4 years ago
71666cbb54
ch10: replace - by – in Total Fees equation
4 years ago
39d0111fe2
glossary: start a new sentence in"P2SH address"
4 years ago
eef7d4308b
ch04: sentence is about vanity pool, not pool in general
4 years ago
d06e7c54bf
glossary: BIP32 -> BIP-32
4 years ago
ab67789c98
ch08: delete extra space before "These two BIPs"
4 years ago
442f6f74e9
ch06: Typo fixes
...
Fix a minor punctuation typo
4 years ago
2da27d33c0
ch08: outputs -> output
4 years ago
e3695afbf6
Merge pull request #742 from syncom/syncom/ch07-2-of-5-multisig
...
ch07: 2-of-5 instead of 2-of-3 for Mohammed's example
4 years ago
bf56c59a85
Merge pull request #746 from jerzybrzoska/patch-3
...
ch.02: Let us not be too assuming about the gender of "each miner"
4 years ago
5d50a93ee6
ch10: Align target description with the actual implementation
...
See: 43f3ada27b/src/pow.cpp (L86-L88)
4 years ago
65dd6b8be0
ch.02: Let us not be too assuming about the gender of "each miner"
...
It is too assuming to suppose that the gender of "each miner" is masculine. Hence I propose to use [singular they](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they ). More on singular they [here](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/ ).
'He' was substituted with 'they' only when it refers to "each miner", i.e. miners in general, and not when it refers to Jing. In the latter case I have left he unchanged.
4 years ago
7284634837
Nit: exponentially -> significantly
...
In the dice rolling example, because there are only two dice, the phrase 'exponentially more' could cause confusion. It feels better to be a bit handwavy here and just say 'significantly more'.
4 years ago
c942d694b6
ch07: Typo fixes
...
Fix minor typos related to 'equal to' and 'less/greater than'.
4 years ago
06f1a947e9
chp04: xref <<vanity_minor_code>> seems better for note on std:random_device
...
Because 'std::random_device' appears in xref vanity_miner_code as opposed to xref vanity_miner_run, it feels more appropriate to use the former in this note.
4 years ago
Will Binns