mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook
synced 2024-11-21 23:58:09 +00:00
Edited ch12_mining.adoc with Atlas code editor
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e02f1ea88
commit
e0bde9f1c1
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
[[mining]]
|
||||
== Mining and Consensus
|
||||
|
||||
The ((("mining", "purpose of")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "purpose of")))word "mining" is somewhat
|
||||
The ((("mining", "purpose of")))word "mining" is somewhat
|
||||
misleading. By evoking the extraction of precious metals, it focuses our
|
||||
attention on the reward for mining, the new bitcoins created in each
|
||||
block. Although mining is incentivized by this reward, the primary
|
||||
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Mining
|
||||
is one of the mechanisms by which Bitcoin's _consensus security_ is _decentralized_.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Miners ((("bitcoins", "mining", "operational overview", id="bitcoin-mining-overview")))((("mining", "operational overview", id="mining-overview")))record new transactions on the global blockchain. A
|
||||
Miners ((("mining", "operational overview", id="mining-overview")))record new transactions on the global blockchain. A
|
||||
new block, containing transactions that occurred since the last block,
|
||||
is _mined_ every 10 minutes on average, thereby adding those
|
||||
transactions to the blockchain. Transactions that become part of a block
|
||||
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ decentralized consensus mechanism that underpins Bitcoin's security.
|
||||
To understand mining and consensus, we will track Alice's transaction
|
||||
as it is received and added to a block by Jing's mining equipment. Then
|
||||
we will follow the block as it is mined, added to the blockchain, and
|
||||
accepted by the Bitcoin network through the process of ((("bitcoins", "mining", "operational overview", startref="bitcoin-mining-overview")))((("mining", "operational overview", startref="mining-overview")))emergent
|
||||
accepted by the Bitcoin network through the process of ((("mining", "operational overview", startref="mining-overview")))emergent
|
||||
consensus.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Bitcoin Economics and Currency Creation
|
||||
@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ outweighs the risks of((("Bitcoin", "economics of", startref="bitcoin-economics"
|
||||
|
||||
=== Decentralized Consensus
|
||||
|
||||
In the ((("bitcoins", "mining", "decentralized consensus", id="bitcoin-mining-consensus")))((("mining", "decentralized consensus", id="mining-consensus")))((("decentralized consensus", id="decentral-consensus")))((("emergent consensus", id="emergent-consensus")))((("consensus", see="decentralized consensus")))previous chapter we looked at the
|
||||
In the ((("mining", "decentralized consensus", id="mining-consensus")))((("decentralized consensus", id="decentral-consensus")))((("emergent consensus", id="emergent-consensus")))((("consensus", see="decentralized consensus")))previous chapter we looked at the
|
||||
blockchain, the global list of all transactions, which
|
||||
everyone in the Bitcoin network accepts as the authoritative record of
|
||||
ownership transfers.
|
||||
@ -248,13 +248,13 @@ processes that occur independently on nodes across the network:
|
||||
In the next few sections, we will examine these processes and how they
|
||||
interact to create the emergent property of network-wide consensus that
|
||||
allows any Bitcoin node to assemble its own copy of the authoritative,
|
||||
trusted, public, global ((("bitcoins", "mining", "decentralized consensus", startref="bitcoin-mining-consensus")))((("mining", "decentralized consensus", startref="mining-consensus")))((("decentralized consensus", startref="decentral-consensus")))((("emergent consensus", startref="emergent-consensus")))blockchain.
|
||||
trusted, public, global ((("mining", "decentralized consensus", startref="mining-consensus")))((("decentralized consensus", startref="decentral-consensus")))((("emergent consensus", startref="emergent-consensus")))blockchain.
|
||||
|
||||
[[tx_verification]]
|
||||
=== Independent Verification of Transactions
|
||||
|
||||
In
|
||||
<<c_transactions>>, we saw ((("bitcoins", "mining", "independent transaction verification", id="bitcoin-mining-verify")))((("mining", "independent transaction verification", id="mining-verify")))((("transactions", "independent verification", id="transaction-verify")))((("independent transaction verification", id="independent-transaction-verify")))((("verifying", "transactions", id="verify-transaction")))((("nodes", "transaction verification", id="node-verify")))how wallet software creates transactions by
|
||||
<<c_transactions>>, we saw ((("mining", "independent transaction verification", id="mining-verify")))((("transactions", "independent verification", id="transaction-verify")))((("independent transaction verification", id="independent-transaction-verify")))((("verifying", "transactions", id="verify-transaction")))((("nodes", "transaction verification", id="node-verify")))how wallet software creates transactions by
|
||||
collecting UTXOs, providing the appropriate authentication data, and then
|
||||
constructing new outputs assigned to a new owner. The resulting
|
||||
transaction is then sent to the neighboring nodes in the Bitcoin network
|
||||
@ -303,12 +303,12 @@ address new types of denial-of-service attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
By independently verifying each transaction as it is received and before
|
||||
propagating it, every node builds a pool of valid (but unconfirmed)
|
||||
transactions known ((("bitcoins", "mining", "independent transaction verification", startref="bitcoin-mining-verify")))((("mining", "independent transaction verification", startref="mining-verify")))((("transactions", "independent verification", startref="transaction-verify")))((("independent transaction verification", startref="independent-transaction-verify")))((("verifying", "transactions", startref="verify-transaction")))((("nodes", "transaction verification", startref="node-verify")))((("memory pool")))as the _memory pool_ or
|
||||
transactions known ((("mining", "independent transaction verification", startref="mining-verify")))((("transactions", "independent verification", startref="transaction-verify")))((("independent transaction verification", startref="independent-transaction-verify")))((("verifying", "transactions", startref="verify-transaction")))((("nodes", "transaction verification", startref="node-verify")))((("memory pool")))as the _memory pool_ or
|
||||
_mempool_.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Mining Nodes
|
||||
|
||||
Some of the((("bitcoins", "mining", "miners, purpose of", id="bitcoin-mining-miner-purpose")))((("mining", "miner nodes, purpose of", id="mining-nodes-purpose")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "purpose of", id="nodes-miner-purpose"))) nodes on the Bitcoin network are specialized nodes
|
||||
Some of the((("mining", "miner nodes, purpose of", id="mining-nodes-purpose")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "purpose of", id="nodes-miner-purpose"))) nodes on the Bitcoin network are specialized nodes
|
||||
called _miners_. Jing is a
|
||||
Bitcoin miner; he
|
||||
earns bitcoin by running a "mining rig," which is a specialized
|
||||
@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ finding a solution according to the proof-of-work algorithm.
|
||||
|
||||
When Jing's node aggregates all the transactions from the memory pool,
|
||||
the new candidate block has several thousand transactions that each pay
|
||||
transaction fees he'll attempt to((("bitcoins", "mining", "miners, purpose of", startref="bitcoin-mining-miner-purpose")))((("mining", "miner nodes, purpose of", startref="mining-nodes-purpose")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "purpose of", startref="nodes-miner-purpose"))) claim.
|
||||
transaction fees he'll attempt to((("mining", "miner nodes, purpose of", startref="mining-nodes-purpose")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "purpose of", startref="nodes-miner-purpose"))) claim.
|
||||
|
||||
==== The Coinbase Transaction
|
||||
|
||||
@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ version field set to 2 or higher) must contain the block height as a script
|
||||
=== Constructing the Block Header
|
||||
|
||||
To
|
||||
construct ((("bitcoins", "mining", "constructing block header", id="bitcoin-mining-blockheader")))((("mining", "constructing block header", id="mining-blockheader")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "constructing block header", id="nodes-miner-blockheader")))((("block header", "constructing", id="block-header-construct")))the block header, the mining node needs to fill in six fields,
|
||||
construct ((("mining", "constructing block header", id="mining-blockheader")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "constructing block header", id="nodes-miner-blockheader")))((("block header", "constructing", id="block-header-construct")))the block header, the mining node needs to fill in six fields,
|
||||
as listed in <<block_header_structure_ch10>>.
|
||||
|
||||
++++
|
||||
@ -694,13 +694,13 @@ With all the other fields filled, the header of the candidate block is now compl
|
||||
the process of mining can begin. The goal is now to find a header
|
||||
that results in a hash that is less than the target.
|
||||
The mining node will need to test billions or trillions of variations of
|
||||
the header before a version is found that satisfies the((("bitcoins", "mining", "constructing block header", startref="bitcoin-mining-blockheader")))((("mining", "constructing block header", startref="mining-blockheader")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "constructing block header", startref="nodes-miner-blockheader")))((("block header", "constructing", startref="block-header-construct"))) requirement.
|
||||
the header before a version is found that satisfies the((("mining", "constructing block header", startref="mining-blockheader")))((("nodes", "miner nodes", "constructing block header", startref="nodes-miner-blockheader")))((("block header", "constructing", startref="block-header-construct"))) requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
[role="less_space pagebreak-before"]
|
||||
=== Mining the Block
|
||||
|
||||
Now
|
||||
that((("candidate blocks", "mining", id="candidate-mine")))((("blocks", "candidate blocks", "mining", id="block-candidate-mine")))((("mining", "candidate blocks", id="mining-candidate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "candidate blocks", id="bitcoin-mining-candidate"))) a candidate block has been constructed by Jing's node, it is time
|
||||
that((("candidate blocks", "mining", id="candidate-mine")))((("blocks", "candidate blocks", "mining", id="block-candidate-mine")))((("mining", "candidate blocks", id="mining-candidate"))) a candidate block has been constructed by Jing's node, it is time
|
||||
for Jing's hardware mining rig to "mine" the block, to find a solution
|
||||
to the proof-of-work algorithm that makes the block valid. Throughout
|
||||
this book we have studied cryptographic hash functions as used in
|
||||
@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ until the desired hash result appears by chance.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Proof-of-Work Algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
A hash((("bitcoins", "mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", id="bitcoin-mining-proof")))((("mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", id="mining-proof")))((("hash functions", "proof-of-work algorithm", id="hash-proof")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", id="proof-mining"))) algorithm takes an
|
||||
A hash((("mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", id="mining-proof")))((("hash functions", "proof-of-work algorithm", id="hash-proof")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", id="proof-mining"))) algorithm takes an
|
||||
arbitrary-length data input and produces a fixed-length deterministic
|
||||
result, called a _digest_. The digest is a digital commitment to the
|
||||
input. For any specific input, the resulting digest will always be the
|
||||
@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ enough block header hash.
|
||||
//TODO:use visual representation like I did on bitcoin.org
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Block headers ((("bitcoins", "mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", startref="bitcoin-mining-proof")))((("mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", startref="mining-proof")))((("hash functions", "proof-of-work algorithm", startref="hash-proof")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", startref="proof-mining")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "target representation", id="bitcoin-mining-target")))((("mining", "target representation", id="mining-target")))((("targets", "representation of", id="target-represent")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "target representation", id="proof-target")))contain the target in a notation called "target
|
||||
Block headers ((("mining", "proof-of-work algorithm", startref="mining-proof")))((("hash functions", "proof-of-work algorithm", startref="hash-proof")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", startref="proof-mining")))((("mining", "target representation", id="mining-target")))((("targets", "representation of", id="target-represent")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "target representation", id="proof-target")))contain the target in a notation called "target
|
||||
bits" or just "bits," which in block 277,316 has the value of
|
||||
+0x1903a30c+. This notation expresses the proof-of-work target as a
|
||||
coefficient/exponent format, with the first two hexadecimal digits for
|
||||
@ -905,12 +905,12 @@ header hash less than the target. In binary that number must
|
||||
have more than 60 leading bits set to zero. With this level of
|
||||
difficulty, a single miner processing 1 trillion hashes per second (1
|
||||
terahash per second or 1 TH/sec) would only find a solution once every
|
||||
8,496 blocks or once every 59 days, ((("bitcoins", "mining", "target representation", startref="bitcoin-mining-target")))((("mining", "target representation", startref="mining-target")))((("targets", "representation of", startref="target-represent")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "target representation", startref="proof-target")))on average.
|
||||
8,496 blocks or once every 59 days, ((("mining", "target representation", startref="mining-target")))((("targets", "representation of", startref="target-represent")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "target representation", startref="proof-target")))on average.
|
||||
|
||||
[[target]]
|
||||
==== Retargeting to Adjust Difficulty
|
||||
|
||||
As we saw, ((("bitcoins", "mining", "adjusting difficulty", id="bitcoin-mining-difficulty")))((("mining", "adjusting difficulty", id="mining-difficulty")))((("targets", "adjusting difficulty", id="target-difficulty")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "adjusting difficulty", id="proof-difficulty")))((("difficulty", "adjusting", id="difficulty-adjust")))the target determines the difficulty and
|
||||
As we saw, ((("mining", "adjusting difficulty", id="mining-difficulty")))((("targets", "adjusting difficulty", id="target-difficulty")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "adjusting difficulty", id="proof-difficulty")))((("difficulty", "adjusting", id="difficulty-adjust")))the target determines the difficulty and
|
||||
therefore affects how long it takes to find a solution to the
|
||||
proof-of-work algorithm. This leads to the obvious questions: Why is the
|
||||
difficulty adjustable, who adjusts it, and how?
|
||||
@ -1013,13 +1013,13 @@ possible with the current generation of silicon fabrication, converting
|
||||
electricity into hashing computation at the highest rate possible. The
|
||||
primary influence on the mining market is the price of one kilowatt-hour
|
||||
of electricity in bitcoin because that determines the profitability of
|
||||
mining and therefore the incentives to enter or exit the ((("bitcoins", "mining", "adjusting difficulty", startref="bitcoin-mining-difficulty")))((("mining", "adjusting difficulty", startref="mining-difficulty")))((("targets", "adjusting difficulty", startref="target-difficulty")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "adjusting difficulty", startref="proof-difficulty")))((("difficulty", "adjusting", startref="difficulty-adjust")))mining
|
||||
mining and therefore the incentives to enter or exit the ((("mining", "adjusting difficulty", startref="mining-difficulty")))((("targets", "adjusting difficulty", startref="target-difficulty")))((("proof-of-work algorithm", "adjusting difficulty", startref="proof-difficulty")))((("difficulty", "adjusting", startref="difficulty-adjust")))mining
|
||||
market.
|
||||
|
||||
[[mtp]]
|
||||
=== Median Time Past (MTP)
|
||||
|
||||
In Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "timestamps and", id="decentral-consensus-timestamp")))((("consensus rules", "timestamps and", id="consensus-timestamp")))((("timestamps", id="timestamp")))((("median time past (MTP)", id="median-time-past")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "timestamps", id="bitcoin-mining-timestamps")))((("mining", "timestamps", id="mining-timestamps")))there is a subtle, but very
|
||||
In Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "timestamps and", id="decentral-consensus-timestamp")))((("consensus rules", "timestamps and", id="consensus-timestamp")))((("timestamps", id="timestamp")))((("median time past (MTP)", id="median-time-past")))((("mining", "timestamps", id="mining-timestamps")))there is a subtle, but very
|
||||
significant, difference between wall time and consensus time. Bitcoin is
|
||||
a decentralized network, which means that each participant has his or
|
||||
her own perspective of time. Events on the network do not occur
|
||||
@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ MTP changes the implementation of time calculations for
|
||||
lock time, +CLTV+, sequence, and +CSV+. The consensus time
|
||||
calculated by MTP is usually about one hour behind
|
||||
wall clock time. If you create timelock transactions, you should account
|
||||
for it when estimating the desired value to encode ((("decentralized consensus", "timestamps and", startref="decentral-consensus-timestamp")))((("consensus rules", "timestamps and", startref="consensus-timestamp")))((("timestamps", startref="timestamp")))((("median time past (MTP)", startref="median-time-past")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "timestamps", startref="bitcoin-mining-timestamps")))((("mining", "timestamps", startref="mining-timestamps")))in lock time,
|
||||
for it when estimating the desired value to encode ((("decentralized consensus", "timestamps and", startref="decentral-consensus-timestamp")))((("consensus rules", "timestamps and", startref="consensus-timestamp")))((("timestamps", startref="timestamp")))((("median time past (MTP)", startref="median-time-past")))((("mining", "timestamps", startref="mining-timestamps")))in lock time,
|
||||
sequence, +CLTV+, and +CSV+.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Successfully Mining the Block
|
||||
@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ a block at the same height and immediately start computing the next
|
||||
block in the chain, using Jing's block as the "parent." By building on
|
||||
top of Jing's newly discovered block, the other miners are essentially
|
||||
using their mining power to endorse Jing's block and the
|
||||
chain((("candidate blocks", "mining", startref="candidate-mine")))((("blocks", "candidate blocks", "mining", startref="block-candidate-mine")))((("mining", "candidate blocks", startref="mining-candidate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "candidate blocks", startref="bitcoin-mining-candidate"))) it extends.
|
||||
chain((("candidate blocks", "mining", startref="candidate-mine")))((("blocks", "candidate blocks", "mining", startref="block-candidate-mine")))((("mining", "candidate blocks", startref="mining-candidate"))) it extends.
|
||||
|
||||
In the next section, we'll look at the process each node uses to
|
||||
validate a block and select the most-work chain, creating the consensus
|
||||
@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ that forms the decentralized blockchain.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Validating a New Block
|
||||
|
||||
The third ((("bitcoins", "mining", "validating blocks", id="bitcoin-mining-validate")))((("mining", "validating blocks", id="mining-validate")))((("blocks", "validating", id="block-validate")))((("validating", "blocks", id="validate-block")))((("decentralized consensus", "validating blocks", id="decentral-consensus-validate")))((("nodes", "validating blocks", id="nodes-validate")))step in Bitcoin's
|
||||
The third ((("mining", "validating blocks", id="mining-validate")))((("blocks", "validating", id="block-validate")))((("validating", "blocks", id="validate-block")))((("decentralized consensus", "validating blocks", id="decentral-consensus-validate")))((("nodes", "validating blocks", id="nodes-validate")))step in Bitcoin's
|
||||
consensus mechanism is independent validation of each new block by every
|
||||
node on the network. As the newly solved block moves across the network,
|
||||
each node performs a series of tests to validate it.
|
||||
@ -1159,14 +1159,14 @@ The miners have to construct a block, based on the shared rules
|
||||
that all nodes follow, and mine it with a correct solution to the
|
||||
PoW. To do so, they expend a lot of electricity in mining, and
|
||||
if they cheat, all the electricity and effort is wasted. This is why
|
||||
independent validation is a key component of ((("bitcoins", "mining", "validating blocks", startref="bitcoin-mining-validate")))((("mining", "validating blocks", startref="mining-validate")))((("blocks", "validating", startref="block-validate")))((("validating", "blocks", startref="validate-block")))((("decentralized consensus", "validating blocks", startref="decentral-consensus-validate")))((("nodes", "validating blocks", startref="nodes-validate")))decentralized consensus.
|
||||
independent validation is a key component of ((("mining", "validating blocks", startref="mining-validate")))((("blocks", "validating", startref="block-validate")))((("validating", "blocks", startref="validate-block")))((("decentralized consensus", "validating blocks", startref="decentral-consensus-validate")))((("nodes", "validating blocks", startref="nodes-validate")))decentralized consensus.
|
||||
|
||||
//FIXME:normalize terminology between "block-finding race", "mining
|
||||
//race", and "forks"
|
||||
[[forks]]
|
||||
=== Assembling and Selecting Chains of Blocks
|
||||
|
||||
The final ((("bitcoins", "mining", "assembling blockchain", id="bitcoin-mining-assemble")))((("mining", "assembling blockchain", id="mining-assemble")))((("blockchain", "assembling", id="blockchain-assemble")))((("decentralized consensus", "assembling blockchain", id="decentral-consensus-assemble")))part in Bitcoin's decentralized
|
||||
The final ((("mining", "assembling blockchain", id="mining-assemble")))((("blockchain", "assembling", id="blockchain-assemble")))((("decentralized consensus", "assembling blockchain", id="decentral-consensus-assemble")))part in Bitcoin's decentralized
|
||||
consensus mechanism is the assembly of blocks into chains and the
|
||||
selection of the chain with the most proof of work.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1237,14 +1237,14 @@ security, you'd prefer a system with 1-minute blocks, where you could
|
||||
wait for three blocks, over a system with 10-minute blocks. The shorter
|
||||
the time between blocks, the more miner work is wasted on accidental
|
||||
forks (in addition to other problems), so many people prefer Bitcoin's
|
||||
10-minute blocks over shorter block ((("bitcoins", "mining", "assembling blockchain", startref="bitcoin-mining-assemble")))((("mining", "assembling blockchain", startref="mining-assemble")))((("blockchain", "assembling", startref="blockchain-assemble")))((("decentralized consensus", "assembling blockchain", startref="decentral-consensus-assemble")))intervals.
|
||||
10-minute blocks over shorter block ((("mining", "assembling blockchain", startref="mining-assemble")))((("blockchain", "assembling", startref="blockchain-assemble")))((("decentralized consensus", "assembling blockchain", startref="decentral-consensus-assemble")))intervals.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=== Mining and the Hash Lottery
|
||||
|
||||
Bitcoin mining ((("bitcoins", "mining", "competitiveness of", id="bitcoin-mining-competition")))((("mining", "competitiveness of", id="mining-competitive")))is an extremely competitive industry.
|
||||
Bitcoin mining ((("mining", "competitiveness of", id="mining-competitive")))is an extremely competitive industry.
|
||||
The hashing power has increased exponentially every year of Bitcoin's
|
||||
existence. Some years the growth has reflected a complete change of
|
||||
technology, such as in 2010 and 2011 when many miners switched from
|
||||
@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ a rapid pace.
|
||||
[[extra_nonce]]
|
||||
==== The Extra Nonce Solution
|
||||
|
||||
Since 2012, mining((("bitcoins", "mining", "extra nonce solution", id="bitcoin-mining-nonce")))((("mining", "extra nonce solution", id="mining-nonce")))((("extra nonce solution", id="extra-nonce"))) has evolved to resolve a
|
||||
Since 2012, mining((("mining", "extra nonce solution", id="mining-nonce")))((("extra nonce solution", id="extra-nonce"))) has evolved to resolve a
|
||||
fundamental limitation in the structure of the block header. In the
|
||||
early days of Bitcoin, a miner could find a block by iterating through
|
||||
the nonce until the resulting hash was below the target. As difficulty
|
||||
@ -1301,12 +1301,12 @@ an individual piece of mining equipment to perform up to 281 TH/s by
|
||||
only making changes to the block header. This keeps mining equipment
|
||||
and protocols simpler than incrementing the extra nonce in the coinbase
|
||||
transaction every 4 billion hashes, which requires recalculating the
|
||||
entire left flank of the merkle tree up to ((("bitcoins", "mining", "extra nonce solution", startref="bitcoin-mining-nonce")))((("mining", "extra nonce solution", startref="mining-nonce")))((("extra nonce solution", startref="extra-nonce")))the root.
|
||||
entire left flank of the merkle tree up to ((("mining", "extra nonce solution", startref="mining-nonce")))((("extra nonce solution", startref="extra-nonce")))the root.
|
||||
|
||||
[[mining_pools]]
|
||||
==== Mining Pools
|
||||
|
||||
In this ((("bitcoins", "mining", "mining pools", id="bitcoin-mining-pools")))((("mining", "mining pools", id="mining-mining-pools")))((("mining pools", id="mining-pools")))highly competitive environment, individual miners working
|
||||
In this ((("mining", "mining pools", id="mining-mining-pools")))((("mining pools", id="mining-pools")))highly competitive environment, individual miners working
|
||||
alone (also known as solo miners) don't stand a chance. The likelihood
|
||||
of them finding a block to offset their electricity and hardware costs
|
||||
is so low that it represents a gamble, like playing the lottery. Even
|
||||
@ -1483,12 +1483,12 @@ attack problem for Bitcoin itself. Rather, P2Pool makes Bitcoin more
|
||||
robust overall, as part of a diversified mining ecosystem. As of this
|
||||
writing, P2Pool has fallen into disuse, but new protocols such as
|
||||
Stratum v2 can allow individual miners to choose the transactions they
|
||||
include in their((("bitcoins", "mining", "competitiveness of", startref="bitcoin-mining-competition")))((("mining", "competitiveness of", startref="mining-competitive")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "mining pools", startref="bitcoin-mining-pools")))((("mining", "mining pools", startref="mining-mining-pools")))((("mining pools", startref="mining-pools")))((("P2Pool (peer-to-peer mining pool)", startref="p2pool"))) blocks.
|
||||
include in their((("mining", "competitiveness of", startref="mining-competitive")))((("mining", "mining pools", startref="mining-mining-pools")))((("mining pools", startref="mining-pools")))((("P2Pool (peer-to-peer mining pool)", startref="p2pool"))) blocks.
|
||||
|
||||
[[consensus_attacks]]
|
||||
=== Hashrate Attacks
|
||||
|
||||
Bitcoin's ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", id="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "hashrate attacks", id="bitcoin-mining-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", id="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", id="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", id="fork-hashrate")))consensus mechanism is, at least
|
||||
Bitcoin's ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", id="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", id="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", id="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", id="fork-hashrate")))consensus mechanism is, at least
|
||||
theoretically, vulnerable to attack by miners (or pools) that attempt to
|
||||
use their hashing power to dishonest or destructive ends. As we saw, the
|
||||
consensus mechanism depends on having a majority of the miners acting
|
||||
@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ Undoubtedly, a serious hashrate attack would erode confidence in
|
||||
Bitcoin in the short term, possibly causing a significant price decline.
|
||||
However, the Bitcoin network and software are constantly evolving, so
|
||||
attacks would be met with countermeasures by the
|
||||
Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", startref="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="bitcoin-mining-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", startref="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", startref="fork-hashrate")))community.
|
||||
Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", startref="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", startref="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", startref="fork-hashrate")))community.
|
||||
|
||||
[[consensus_changes]]
|
||||
=== Changing the Consensus Rules
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user