From a6f8dfe56ed5a661319dc2a1ec872a2989590c93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: claylock Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:06:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Edited ch14_applications.adoc with Atlas code editor --- ch14_applications.adoc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/ch14_applications.adoc b/ch14_applications.adoc index 255d51f6..46d13435 100644 --- a/ch14_applications.adoc +++ b/ch14_applications.adoc @@ -696,6 +696,7 @@ to cooperate, and force the other party to do a unilateral close with the most recent commitment transaction. If they do that, they have to wait for their funds ((("payment channels", "trustless channels", startref="payment-channel-trustless")))((("trustless channels", startref="trustless-channel")))((("timelocks", "trustless channels", startref="timelock-trustless")))((("commitment transactions", "trustless channels", startref="commit-trustless")))too. +[role="less_space pagebreak-before"] ==== Asymmetric Revocable Commitments Another way((("payment channels", "asymmetric revocable commitments", id="payment-channel-revoke")))((("asymmetric revocable commitments", id="asymmetric-revoke-commit")))((("commitment transactions", "asymmetric revocable commitments", id="commit-revoke")))((("revocable commitments", id="revoke-commit"))) to handle the prior commitment states