mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook
synced 2025-03-24 11:25:43 +00:00
CH02::Bobs view: remove tipbox about unconfirmed safety
This advice may have been somewhat accurate when the first edition of this book was published and opt-in replace-by-fee wasn't available, but that's no longer the case. And now, especially, with default replace-by-fee on the probable horizon, there's even less safety in accepting unconfirmed transactions as final without some type of secondary protection.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e338f0ddc7
commit
a543abe388
@ -509,20 +509,6 @@ transaction through other nodes, it will reach Bob's wallet within a few
|
||||
seconds. Bob's wallet will immediately identify Alice's transaction as
|
||||
an incoming payment because it contains an output redeemable by Bob's
|
||||
keys. Bob's wallet application can also independently verify that the
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
((("confirmations", "of small-value transactions",
|
||||
secondary-sortas="small-value transactions")))A common misconception
|
||||
about bitcoin transactions is that they must be "confirmed" by waiting
|
||||
10 minutes for a new block, or up to 60 minutes for a full six
|
||||
confirmations. Although confirmations ensure the transaction has been
|
||||
accepted by the whole network, such a delay is unnecessary for
|
||||
small-value items such as a cup of coffee. A merchant may accept a valid
|
||||
small-value transaction with no confirmations, with no more risk than a
|
||||
credit card payment made without an ID or a signature, as merchants
|
||||
routinely accept today.((("", startref="Tconstruct02")))
|
||||
====
|
||||
transaction is well formed. If Bob is using his own full node, his
|
||||
wallet can further verify Alice's transaction only spends valid UTXOs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user