Edited ch06_transactions.adoc with Atlas code editor

develop
clenser 7 months ago
parent a7f290d7d2
commit a18875b4e9

@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ and sequence signals, which we'll see in <<rbf>>.
[[relative_timelocks]]
===== Sequence as a consensus-enforced relative timelock
In <<version>>, we learned that the BIP68 soft fork added
In <<version>>, we learned ((("relative timelocks", id="relative-timelock")))that the BIP68 soft fork added
a new constraint to transactions with version numbers 2 or higher. That
constraint applies to the sequence field.
@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ as defined by BIP68.
image::images/mbc3_0603.png["BIP68 definition of sequence encoding"]
Note that any transaction which sets a relative timelock using sequence
also sends the signal for opt-in replace by fee ((("transactions", "inputs", startref="transaction-input")))((("inputs", startref="input-transaction")))((("transactions", "inputs", "sequence field", startref="transaction-input-sequence")))((("inputs", "sequence field", startref="input-transaction-sequence")))((("sequence field (transaction inputs)", startref="sequence-field")))as described in
also sends the signal for opt-in replace by fee ((("transactions", "inputs", startref="transaction-input")))((("inputs", startref="input-transaction")))((("transactions", "inputs", "sequence field", startref="transaction-input-sequence")))((("inputs", "sequence field", startref="input-transaction-sequence")))((("sequence field (transaction inputs)", startref="sequence-field")))((("relative timelocks", startref="relative-timelock")))as described in
<<sequence-bip125>>.
=== Outputs

Loading…
Cancel
Save