|
|
|
@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ ultimately wanted were the new rules added by segwit, but the users
|
|
|
|
|
wanted to multiply their efforts by taking advantage of the large
|
|
|
|
|
numbers of nodes that planned to enforce the rules of segwit if enough
|
|
|
|
|
miners signaled readiness for it. A pseudonymous developer proposed
|
|
|
|
|
BIP148, ((("BIP148 segwit")))which required any node implementing it to reject all blocks
|
|
|
|
|
BIP148, ((("BIP148 activation of segwit")))which required any node implementing it to reject all blocks
|
|
|
|
|
that didn't signal for segwit starting on a certain date and continuing
|
|
|
|
|
until segwit activated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|