Edited ch12_mining.adoc with Atlas code editor

ch12_mining.adoc

@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ majority of the mining power.
 //TODO: update to not use 51% attack name (see other TODO in this
 //chapter)
 
-Despite its name, the 51% attack scenario doesn't actually require 51%
+Despite its ((("majority attacks", startref="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", startref="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", startref="double-spend")))name, the 51% attack scenario doesn't actually require 51%
 of the hashing power. In fact, such an attack can be attempted with a
 smaller percentage of the hashing power. The 51% threshold is simply the
 level at which such an attack is almost guaranteed to succeed. A
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ Undoubtedly, a serious hashrate attack would erode confidence in
 Bitcoin in the short term, possibly causing a significant price decline.
 However, the Bitcoin network and software are constantly evolving, so
 attacks would be met with countermeasures by the
-Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", startref="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="bitcoin-mining-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", startref="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", startref="fork-hashrate")))((("majority attacks", startref="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", startref="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", startref="double-spend")))community.
+Bitcoin ((("decentralized consensus", "hashrate attacks", startref="decentral-consensus-hashrate")))((("bitcoins", "mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="bitcoin-mining-hashrate")))((("mining", "hashrate attacks", startref="mining-hashrate")))((("hashrate attacks", startref="hashrate")))((("forks", "hashrate attacks", startref="fork-hashrate")))community.
 
 [[consensus_changes]]
 === Changing the Consensus Rules