arno/bitcoinbook
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook synced 2024-11-22 08:08:11 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Edited ch07_authorization-authentication.adoc with Atlas code editor

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
claylock 2023-10-26 18:21:22 +00:00
parent 4933223461
commit 638042fa79
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
ch07_authorization-authentication.adoc
View File

@ -325,10 +325,10 @@ spend the funds.
Some Bitcoin documentation, including earlier editions of this book, Some Bitcoin documentation, including earlier editions of this book,
uses the term "m-of-n" for a traditional multisignature. However, it's hard uses the term "m-of-n" for a traditional multisignature. However, it's hard
to tell "m" and "n" apart when they're spoken, so we use the alternative to tell "m" and "n" apart when they're spoken, so we use the alternative
t-of-k. Both phrases refer to the same type of signature scheme. _t_-of-_k_. Both phrases refer to the same type of signature scheme.
==== ====
The general form of an output script setting a t-of-k multisignature The general form of an output script setting a _t_-of-_k_ multisignature
condition is: condition is:
---- ----
@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ OP_0 <Sig B> <Sig C>
Some people believe this oddity was a bug in the original code for Some people believe this oddity was a bug in the original code for
Bitcoin, but a plausible alternative explanation exists. Verifying Bitcoin, but a plausible alternative explanation exists. Verifying
t-of-k signatures can require many more than t or k signature checking _t_-of-_k_ signatures can require many more than _t_ or _k_ signature checking
operations. Let's consider a simple example of 1-in-5, with the operations. Let's consider a simple example of 1-in-5, with the
following combined script: following combined script: