Edited ch12_mining.adoc with Atlas code editor

ch12_mining.adoc

@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ activation of((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "BIP8 mandatory lock-in", start
 
 === Speedy Trial: Fail Fast or Succeed Eventually
 
-Although BIP9 by itself did not seem to result in the activation of
+Although ((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="consensus-soft-speed")))((("forks", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="fork-soft-speed")))((("soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="soft-fork-speed")))((("speedy trial activation", id="speed-trial")))((("activation (soft forks)", "speedy trial", id="activation-speed")))BIP9 by itself did not seem to result in the activation of
 segwit despite widespread support for the proposal, it was unclear to
 many protocol developers that BIP9 was itself a failure.  As mentioned,
 the failure of miners to initially signal support for segwit may have
@@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@ activated about six months later.  To proponents of speedy trial, it was
 a clear success.  Others were still disappointed that BIP8 wasn't used.
 
 It's not clear whether or not speedy trial will be used again for a
-future attempt to activate a soft fork.
+future attempt to activate a ((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="consensus-soft-speed")))((("forks", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="fork-soft-speed")))((("soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="soft-fork-speed")))((("speedy trial activation", startref="speed-trial")))((("activation (soft forks)", "speedy trial", startref="activation-speed")))soft fork.
 
 === Consensus Software Development