mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook
synced 2024-12-24 23:48:32 +00:00
Edited ch12_mining.adoc with Atlas code editor
This commit is contained in:
parent
25a535c3c3
commit
61f3763dc8
@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ activation of((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "BIP8 mandatory lock-in", start
|
||||
|
||||
=== Speedy Trial: Fail Fast or Succeed Eventually
|
||||
|
||||
Although BIP9 by itself did not seem to result in the activation of
|
||||
Although ((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="consensus-soft-speed")))((("forks", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="fork-soft-speed")))((("soft forks", "speedy trial activation", id="soft-fork-speed")))((("speedy trial activation", id="speed-trial")))((("activation (soft forks)", "speedy trial", id="activation-speed")))BIP9 by itself did not seem to result in the activation of
|
||||
segwit despite widespread support for the proposal, it was unclear to
|
||||
many protocol developers that BIP9 was itself a failure. As mentioned,
|
||||
the failure of miners to initially signal support for segwit may have
|
||||
@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@ activated about six months later. To proponents of speedy trial, it was
|
||||
a clear success. Others were still disappointed that BIP8 wasn't used.
|
||||
|
||||
It's not clear whether or not speedy trial will be used again for a
|
||||
future attempt to activate a soft fork.
|
||||
future attempt to activate a ((("consensus rules", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="consensus-soft-speed")))((("forks", "soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="fork-soft-speed")))((("soft forks", "speedy trial activation", startref="soft-fork-speed")))((("speedy trial activation", startref="speed-trial")))((("activation (soft forks)", "speedy trial", startref="activation-speed")))soft fork.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Consensus Software Development
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user