mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook
synced 2024-11-16 04:59:35 +00:00
Merge pull request #870 from rating89us/patch-66
ch10: update total hashing power list and charts
This commit is contained in:
commit
2fb5578a37
@ -831,30 +831,34 @@ Bitcoin's block interval of 10 minutes is a design compromise between fast confi
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
((("mining and consensus", "hashing power race", id="MAChash10")))Bitcoin mining is an extremely competitive industry. The hashing power has increased exponentially every year of bitcoin's existence. Some years the growth has reflected a complete change of technology, such as in 2010 and 2011 when many miners switched from using CPU mining to GPU mining and field programmable gate array (FPGA) mining. In 2013 the introduction of ASIC mining lead to another giant leap in mining power, by placing the SHA256 function directly on silicon chips specialized for the purpose of mining. The first such chips could deliver more mining power in a single box than the entire bitcoin network in 2010.
|
((("mining and consensus", "hashing power race", id="MAChash10")))Bitcoin mining is an extremely competitive industry. The hashing power has increased exponentially every year of bitcoin's existence. Some years the growth has reflected a complete change of technology, such as in 2010 and 2011 when many miners switched from using CPU mining to GPU mining and field programmable gate array (FPGA) mining. In 2013 the introduction of ASIC mining lead to another giant leap in mining power, by placing the SHA256 function directly on silicon chips specialized for the purpose of mining. The first such chips could deliver more mining power in a single box than the entire bitcoin network in 2010.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The following list shows the total hashing power of the bitcoin network, over the first eight years of operation:
|
The following list shows the total hashing power of the bitcoin network in terahashes/sec (TH/sec), since its inception in 2009 (source: Blockchain.com):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2009:: 0.5 MH/sec–8 MH/sec (16× growth)
|
2009:: 0.000004 – 0.00001 TH/sec (2.40× growth)
|
||||||
2010:: 8 MH/sec–116 GH/sec (14,500× growth)
|
2010:: 0.00001 – 0.14 TH/sec (14,247× growth)
|
||||||
2011:: 116 GH/sec–9 TH/sec (78× growth)
|
2011:: 0.14 – 9.49 TH/sec (63.92× growth)
|
||||||
2012:: 9 TH/sec–23 TH/sec (2.56#x00D7; growth)
|
2012:: 9.49 – 22 TH/sec (2.32× growth)
|
||||||
2013:: 23 TH/sec–10 PH/sec (450× growth)
|
2013:: 22.04 – 15,942 TH/sec (723.32× growth)
|
||||||
2014:: 10 PH/sec–300 PH/sec (30× growth)
|
2014:: 15,942 – 306,333 TH/sec (19.21× growth)
|
||||||
2015:: 300 PH/sec-800 PH/sec (2.66× growth)
|
2015:: 306,333 – 881,232 TH/sec (2.87× growth)
|
||||||
2016:: 800 PH/sec-2.5 EH/sec (3.12× growth)
|
2016:: 881,232 – 2,807,540 TH/sec (3.18× growth)
|
||||||
|
2017:: 2,807,540 – 18,206,558 TH/sec (6.48× growth)
|
||||||
|
2018:: 18,206,558 – 41,801,528 TH/sec (2.29× growth)
|
||||||
|
2019:: 41,801,528 – 109,757,127 TH/sec (2.62× growth)
|
||||||
|
2020:: 109,757,127 – 149,064,869 TH/sec (1.35× growth)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the chart in <<network_hashing_power>>, we can see that bitcoin network's hashing power increased over the past two years. As you can see, the competition between miners and the growth of bitcoin has resulted in an exponential increase in the hashing power (total hashes per second across the network).
|
In the chart in <<network_hashing_power>>, we can see that bitcoin network's hashing power increased over the past two years. As you can see, the competition between miners and the growth of bitcoin has resulted in an exponential increase in the hashing power (total hashes per second across the network).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[network_hashing_power]]
|
[[network_hashing_power]]
|
||||||
.Total hashing power, terahashes per second (TH/sec)
|
.Total hashing power, terahashes per second (TH/sec) (chart on a linear scale)
|
||||||
image::images/mbc2_1007.png["NetworkHashingRate"]
|
image::images/mbc2_1007.png["NetworkHashingRate"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As the amount of hashing power applied to mining bitcoin has exploded, the difficulty has risen to match it. The difficulty metric in the chart shown in <<bitcoin_difficulty>> is measured as a ratio of current difficulty over minimum difficulty (the difficulty of the first block).
|
As the amount of hashing power applied to mining bitcoin has exploded, the difficulty has risen to match it. The difficulty metric in the chart shown in <<bitcoin_difficulty>> is measured as a ratio of current difficulty over minimum difficulty (the difficulty of the first block).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[bitcoin_difficulty]]
|
[[bitcoin_difficulty]]
|
||||||
.Bitcoin's mining difficulty metric
|
.Bitcoin's mining difficulty metric (chart on a logarithmic scale)
|
||||||
image::images/mbc2_1008.png["BitcoinDifficulty"]
|
image::images/mbc2_1008.png["BitcoinDifficulty"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the last two years, the ASIC mining chips have become increasingly denser, approaching the cutting edge of silicon fabrication with a feature size (resolution) of 16 nanometers (nm). Currently, ASIC manufacturers are aiming to overtake general-purpose CPU chip manufacturers, designing chips with a feature size of 14 nm, because the profitability of mining is driving this industry even faster than general computing. There are no more giant leaps left in bitcoin mining, because the industry has reached the forefront of Moore's Law, which stipulates that computing density will double approximately every 18 months. Still, the mining power of the network continues to advance at an exponential pace as the race for higher density chips is matched with a race for higher density data centers where thousands of these chips can be deployed. It's no longer about how much mining can be done with one chip, but how many chips can be squeezed into a building, while still dissipating the heat and providing adequate power.
|
In the last two years, the ASIC mining chips have become increasingly denser, approaching the cutting edge of silicon fabrication with a feature size (resolution) of 7 nanometers (nm). Currently, ASIC manufacturers are aiming to overtake general-purpose CPU chip manufacturers, designing chips with a feature size of 5 nm, because the profitability of mining is driving this industry even faster than general computing. There are no more giant leaps left in bitcoin mining, because the industry has reached the forefront of Moore's Law, which stipulates that computing density will double approximately every 18 months. Still, the mining power of the network continues to advance at an exponential pace as the race for higher density chips is matched with a race for higher density data centers where thousands of these chips can be deployed. It's no longer about how much mining can be done with one chip, but how many chips can be squeezed into a building, while still dissipating the heat and providing adequate power.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[[extra_nonce]]
|
[[extra_nonce]]
|
||||||
==== The Extra Nonce Solution
|
==== The Extra Nonce Solution
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 28 KiB After Width: | Height: | Size: 12 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
Before Width: | Height: | Size: 30 KiB After Width: | Height: | Size: 26 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user