|
|
|
@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ upgrades make unacceptable trade-offs. Common criticisms of soft fork
|
|
|
|
|
changes include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical debt:: Because soft forks are more technically complex than a
|
|
|
|
|
hard fork upgrade, they introduce _technical debt_, a term that refers
|
|
|
|
|
hard fork upgrade, they ((("technical debt")))introduce _technical debt_, a term that refers
|
|
|
|
|
to increasing the future cost of code maintenance because of design
|
|
|
|
|
trade-offs made in the past. Code complexity in turn increases the
|
|
|
|
|
likelihood of bugs and security vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
|