mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook
synced 2024-11-21 23:58:09 +00:00
index symbols
This commit is contained in:
parent
145d6d3064
commit
03f53d3035
@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ needed to force a very deep fork is immense, making old blocks
|
||||
very hard to change. Hashrate attacks also do not affect the security
|
||||
of the private keys and signing algorithms.
|
||||
|
||||
One attack scenario against the consensus mechanism is ((("majority attacks", id="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", primary-sortas="fifty-one percent attacks", id="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", id="double-spend")))called the _majority
|
||||
One attack scenario against the consensus mechanism is ((("majority attacks", id="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", id="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", id="double-spend")))called the _majority
|
||||
attack_ or _51% attack._ In this scenario a group of miners, controlling a majority
|
||||
of the total network's hashing power (such as 51%), collude to attack Bitcoin.
|
||||
With the ability to mine the majority of the blocks, the attacking
|
||||
@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ majority of the mining power.
|
||||
//TODO: update to not use 51% attack name (see other TODO in this
|
||||
//chapter)
|
||||
|
||||
Despite its ((("majority attacks", startref="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", primary-sortas="fifty-one percent attacks", startref="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", startref="double-spend")))name, the 51% attack scenario doesn't actually require 51%
|
||||
Despite its ((("majority attacks", startref="majority-attack")))((("51% attacks", startref="attack-51")))((("double-spend attacks", startref="double-spend")))name, the 51% attack scenario doesn't actually require 51%
|
||||
of the hashing power. In fact, such an attack can be attempted with a
|
||||
smaller percentage of the hashing power. The 51% threshold is simply the
|
||||
level at which such an attack is almost guaranteed to succeed. A
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user