From 0144be950018361664df4f28ca6a3807170531a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nadams Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 06:38:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Edited ch07.asciidoc with Atlas code editor --- ch07.asciidoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ch07.asciidoc b/ch07.asciidoc index 49d99bdf..0788b025 100644 --- a/ch07.asciidoc +++ b/ch07.asciidoc @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ where ++ is a block height or time value estimated 3 months When Bob tries to spend this UTXO, he constructs a transaction that references the UTXO as an input. He uses his signature and public key in the unlocking script of that input and sets the transaction +nLocktime+ to be equal or greater to the timelock in the +CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY+ Alice set. Bob then broadcasts the transaction on the bitcoin network. -Bob's transaction is evaluated as follows. If the +CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY+ parameter Alice set is less than or equal the spending transaction's +nLocktime+, script execution continues (acts as if a NOP opcode was executed). Otherwise, script execution halts and the transaction is deemed invalid. +Bob's transaction is evaluated as follows. If the +CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY+ parameter Alice set is less than or equal the spending transaction's +nLocktime+, script execution continues (acts as if a “no operation” or NOP opcode was executed). Otherwise, script execution halts and the transaction is deemed invalid. More precisely, +CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY+ fails and halts execution, marking the transaction invalid if (source: BIP-65):