qubes-linux-kernel/patches.fixes/aggressive-zone-reclaim.patch
2010-07-07 13:12:45 +02:00

68 lines
2.4 KiB
Diff

From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: be more aggressive with zone reclaims
References: bnc#476525
Patch-mainline: no
The zone reclaim design is not very good for parallel allocations.
The primary problem is that only one thread is allowed to perform
zone-reclaim at a time. If another thread needs memory from that
zone/node, then its zone-reclaim will fail and it will be forced
to fall back to allocating from another zone.
Additionally, the default zone reclaim priority is insufficient
for massively parallel allocations. Lower ZONE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY
to fix it. This can result in higher latency spikes, but similar
kind of page allocation latency can often be encountered as
normal part of page reclaim when pagecache fills memory.
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2501,7 +2501,7 @@ int zone_reclaim_mode __read_mostly;
* of a node considered for each zone_reclaim. 4 scans 1/16th of
* a zone.
*/
-#define ZONE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY 4
+#define ZONE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY 0
/*
* Percentage of pages in a zone that must be unmapped for zone_reclaim to
@@ -2607,6 +2607,8 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *z
slab_reclaimable = zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
if (slab_reclaimable > zone->min_slab_pages) {
+ unsigned long lru_pages = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+
/*
* shrink_slab() does not currently allow us to determine how
* many pages were freed in this zone. So we take the current
@@ -2617,10 +2619,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *z
* Note that shrink_slab will free memory on all zones and may
* take a long time.
*/
- while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, order) &&
- zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) >
- slab_reclaimable - nr_pages)
- ;
+ shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, lru_pages);
/*
* Update nr_reclaimed by the number of slab pages we
@@ -2674,11 +2673,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_
if (node_state(node_id, N_CPU) && node_id != numa_node_id())
return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
- if (zone_test_and_set_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED))
- return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
-
ret = __zone_reclaim(zone, gfp_mask, order);
- zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
if (!ret)
count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED);