34 lines
884 B
Plaintext
34 lines
884 B
Plaintext
From: andrea@suse.de
|
|
Subject: low-latency stuff
|
|
Patch-mainline: not yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point is that preempt and no-preempt should do the same thing there,
|
|
otherwise when you benchmark -preempt, you'll get better latency,
|
|
but not because of the preempt feature, but just because of unrelated
|
|
latency improvements that have nothing to do with preempt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
mm/memory.c | 8 ++++----
|
|
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
--- a/mm/memory.c
|
|
+++ b/mm/memory.c
|
|
@@ -1061,11 +1061,11 @@ static unsigned long unmap_page_range(st
|
|
return addr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
|
|
-# define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE (8 * PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
+/* zap one pte page at a time */
|
|
+#define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE (FREE_PTE_NR * PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
#else
|
|
-/* No preempt: go for improved straight-line efficiency */
|
|
-# define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE (1024 * PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
+#define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE (253 * PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/**
|