2011-01-18 09:24:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Threads in anaconda? No!
|
|
|
|
David Cantrell <dcantrell@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threads make a lot of people run screaming. That's entirely
|
|
|
|
understandable because thread concurrency can be a pain. In this short
|
|
|
|
document, I want to explain why threads are in anaconda and how to work
|
|
|
|
with them in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISCONCEPTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just to make sure everyone is on the same page, threads are similar to
|
|
|
|
processes. The big advantage we get is easier shared data structures.
|
|
|
|
Threads can communicate over more methods than just signals. But,
|
|
|
|
multithreaded does not mean that we are taking every operation out to
|
|
|
|
a separate thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANACONDA THREADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea for anaconda threads is to simplify life for things that can
|
|
|
|
or need to run parallel to other operations. So we will reserve the
|
|
|
|
use of threads for tasks that fit in to this category well (the logging
|
|
|
|
system, for instance) and keep the bulk of the installer in the main
|
|
|
|
thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREADS AND PYTHON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python has a nice model for threading. Threads in Python extend the
|
|
|
|
threading.Thread class. So an easy way to identify something that will
|
|
|
|
run or can be run as a thread is seeing a class definition like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SomeClass(threading.Thread):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You still have your __init__ method for the constructor, but threads
|
|
|
|
also have a run() method and a join() method (there are others, but
|
|
|
|
I will just discuss these).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The run() method is called when you start the thread. This is where
|
|
|
|
you want to do the work. Normally this happens in the class
|
|
|
|
constructor, but in threads we need that separated out to a different
|
|
|
|
method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The join() method is to block execution of other threads. Whatever you
|
|
|
|
put in the join() method will run and other threads will be blocked
|
|
|
|
while it runs. Now, this method is only run when you call it explicitly
|
|
|
|
from another thread, so think of it as similar to waitpid().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python has the thread and threading modules. Use threading as it's
|
|
|
|
built on top of thread and provides a threading system similar to the
|
|
|
|
POSIX thread model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More information:
|
|
|
|
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-threading.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREAD NAMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threads have names in Python. They are automatically assigned or you
|
|
|
|
can specify the name. For anaconda it probably makes more sense to
|
|
|
|
name our threads since we won't be launching more than one for the
|
|
|
|
same task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The convention I'm using is: NameThr
|
|
|
|
For example: RelNotesThr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name is arbitrary, but we should probably have some sort of
|
|
|
|
consistency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PYGTK AND THREADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GTK+ presents the biggest challenge for threads, but it's not
|
2014-04-07 12:38:09 +00:00
|
|
|
impossible. When you call gtk.main(), you need to call it like this:
|
2011-01-18 09:24:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gtk.threads_enter()
|
|
|
|
gtk.main()
|
|
|
|
gtk.threads_leave()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls to PyGTK methods or fiddling with GTK objects...all that has to
|
|
|
|
be wrapped in threads_enter/threads_leave calls. The suggested syntax
|
|
|
|
is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gtk.threads_enter()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
# do stuff
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
gtk.threads_leave()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested reading:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/index.py?req=show&file=faq20.006.htp
|
|
|
|
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-Threads.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will try to expand this document as I move through more threading code.
|
|
|
|
Email me if you have any questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
David Cantrell
|
|
|
|
<dcantrell@redhat.com>
|